Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844508›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Score Analysis for Predicting the Expression of the Immunotherapy Biomarker PD-L1 in Lung Cancer.

Guoping Cheng, Fuchuang Zhang, Yishi Xing, Xingyi Hu, He Zhang, Shiting Chen, Mengdao Li, Chaolong Peng, Guangtai Ding, Dadong Zhang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guoping ChengDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Fuchuang Zhang3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Yishi Xing3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Xingyi HuDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
He ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shiting Chen3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Mengdao Li3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Chaolong Peng3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Guangtai DingSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Dadong Zhang3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Peilin Chen3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai, China.
Qingxin XiaDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Meijuan WuDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai University of Engineering Science · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a critical biomarker for predicting the response to immunotherapy. However, traditional quantitative evaluation of PD-L1 expression using immunohistochemistry staining remains challenging for pathologists. Here we developed a deep learning (DL)-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to automatically analyze the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer patients. A total of 1,288 patients with lung cancer were included in the study. The diagnostic ability of three different AI models (M1, M2, and M3) was assessed in both PD-L1 (22C3) and PD-L1 (SP263) assays. M2 and M3 showed improved performance in the evaluation of PD-L1 expression in the PD-L1 (22C3) assay, especially at 1% cutoff. Highly accurate performance in the PD-L1 (SP263) was also achieved, with accuracy and specificity of 96.4 and 96.8% in both M2 and M3, respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic results of these three AI-assisted models were highly consistent with those from the pathologist. Similar performances of M1, M2, and M3 in the 22C3 dataset were also obtained in lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma in both sampling methods. In conclusion, these results suggest that AI-assisted diagnostic models in PD-L1 expression are a promising tool for improving the efficiency of clinical pathologists.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenLung NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersHumansImmunotherapyB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersAIautomated scoringNSCLCpathological diagnosisPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID35844508
PMCPMC9286729
OpenAlexW4283742109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.