Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844207›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Typical and Atypical Development of Visual Expertise for Print as Indexed by the Visual Word N1 (N170w): A Systematic Review.

Kathleen Kay Amora, Ariane Tretow, Cara Verwimp, Jurgen Tijms, Paavo H T Leppänen, Valéria Csépe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen Kay AmoraBrain Imaging Centre, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Ariane TretowDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Cara VerwimpDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jurgen TijmsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Paavo H T LeppänenDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Valéria CsépeBrain Imaging Centre, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual word N1 (N170w) is an early brain ERP component that has been found to be a neurophysiological marker for print expertise, which is a prelexical requirement associated with reading development. To date, no other review has assimilated existing research on reading difficulties and atypical development of processes reflected in the N170w response. Hence, this systematic review synthesized results and evaluated neurophysiological and experimental procedures across different studies about visual print expertise in reading development. Literature databases were examined for relevant studies from 1995 to 2020 investigating the N170w response in individuals with or without reading disorders. To capture the development of the N170w related to reading, results were compared between three different age groups: pre-literate children, school-aged children, and young adults. The majority of available N170w studies ( Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021228444.

Indexed as

developmental reading disorder (DRD)dyslexiaevent-related potentials (ERP)N170reading developmentsystematic reviewvisual expertisewords

Identifiers

PMID35844207
PMCPMC9279737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.