Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35844087›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022

Women's sexual function before and during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kamran Hessami, Nicolas Sayegh, Abolfazl S Abdolmaleki, Safoura Bakht, Shohra Qaderi, Mohammadhasan Darabi, Tahere Shamsi, Fateme Bagheri

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of the pandemic on sexual function: A comparative study between women of reproductive age and postmenopausal women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Sexual Function of Transgender Individuals.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kamran HessamiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-3553
Nicolas SayeghSaint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abolfazl S AbdolmalekiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Safoura BakhtSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shohra QaderiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadhasan DarabiMaternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Tahere ShamsiSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fateme BagheriSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo systematically review and summarize the available literature regarding the women's sexual function during COVID-19 pandemic and compare it to pre-pandemic period.

methodsWe searched PubMed and Embase from the inception of the databases until 15th April 2021. Data regarding the sexual function, measured by female sexual function index (FSFI), of adult sexually active women were extracted from the eligible studies and compared between the before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary outcome was the frequency of intercourse during pandemic time. The random-effect model was used to pool the mean differences and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I

resultsOur search resulted in a sample of six eligible studies, which involved 1114 female participants. The total FSFI score among study participants during pandemic was 22.93 (95% CI: 19.26-26.59), which indicated a significant decrease in sexual function of women during pandemic as compared to pre-pandemic time (mean difference = -3.80, 95% CI: -6.48 to -1.12, p = 0.005, I

conclusionOverall, there was a significant decrease in sexual function of sexually active adult women during COVID-19 pandemic. The most affected areas of sexual function were arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction. Physicians must be aware of COVID-19 impact on sexual life of women and provide proper counseling.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCoitusFemaleHumansOrgasmPainPandemicsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19female sexual function indexmeta-analysispandemicsexual healthwomen

Identifiers

PMID35844087
PMCPMC9349639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.