Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35843944›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

The surgical outcomes and risk factors of giant hepatic haemangiomas: a single centre experience.

Zhitao Dong, Kunpeng Fang, Chengjun Sui, Junwu Guo, Binghua Dai, Li Geng, Jiamei Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhitao Dong *Department of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China.
Kunpeng Fang *Department of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China.
Chengjun Sui *Department of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China.
Junwu GuoDepartment of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China.
Binghua DaiDepartment of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China.
Li GengDepartment of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China. luokunl2011@126.com.
Jiamei YangDepartment of Special Treatment, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The 15th floor, No.225 Changhai Road, YangPu district, Shang Hai, 200438, China. doc_yjm@126.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality No.12ZR1440000Shanghai Science and Technology Guidance Project No.134119a7000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety of performing surgery on cavernous haemangiomas in the liver larger than 10 cm and establish preoperative predictors of intraoperative blood transfusion and morbidity.

methodsA total of 373 patients with haemangiomas larger than 10 cm who underwent surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analysed. According to tumour diameter, the patients were divided into a giant haemangioma (GH) group (241 cases) (10 cm ≤ diameter < 15 cm) and an enormous haemangioma (EH) group (132 cases) (diameter ≥ 15 cm). Clinical parameters were then compared between the two groups.

resultsCompared with the GH group, the EH group had higher rates of leukopenia (10.6% vs. 4.5%), anaemia (26.5% vs. 15.7%), and thrombocytopenia (13.6% vs. 6.2%). The occlusion time in the EH group was longer than that in the GH group (26.33 ± 14.10 min vs. 31.85 ± 20.09 min, P < 0.01). The blood loss and blood transfusion in the EH group were greater than those in the GH group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the morbidity in the EH group was higher than that in the GH group (17.4% vs. 9.13%, P < 0.05). According to the results of the multivariable analysis, the operation time and size of the haemangioma may be independent risk factors for blood transfusion (P < 0.05). Additionally, the size of the haemangioma may be an independent risk factor associated with complications (P < 0.05).

conclusionEnormous haemangioma is more likely to cause haematologic abnormalities than giant hepatic haemangioma. The risks of the operation and postoperative complications of enormous haemangioma are higher than those of giant hepatic haemangioma.

Indexed as

HemangiomaHemangioma, CavernousLiver NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeHepatic cavernous haemangiomaLiverLiver resection

Identifiers

PMID35843944
PMCPMC9290193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.