Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35843909›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2022

Towards Solving the PFAS Problem: The Potential Role of Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Laura I FitzGerald, Joseph F Olorunyomi, Ruhani Singh, Cara M Doherty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Adsorption of Forever Chemical Pollutants: The Physical Chemistry of PFAS Near Surfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura I FitzGeraldCSIRO Manufacturing, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, 3169, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-5173
Joseph F OlorunyomiCSIRO Manufacturing, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, 3169, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-8436
Ruhani SinghCSIRO Manufacturing, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, 3169, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-7716
Cara M DohertyCSIRO Manufacturing, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, 3169, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-2873

Funding

Veski Inspiring Women Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of recalcitrant molecules that have been used since the 1940s in a variety of applications. They are now linked to a host of negative health outcomes and are extremely resistant to degradation under environmental conditions. Currently, membrane technologies or adsorbents are used to remediate contaminated water. These techniques are either inefficient at capturing smaller PFAS molecules, have high energy demands, or result in concentrated waste that must be incinerated at high temperatures. This Review focuses on what role metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) may play in addressing the PFAS problem. Specifically, how the unique properties of MOFs such as their well-defined pore sizes, ultra-high internal surface area, and tunable surface chemistry may be a sustainable solution for PFAS contamination.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsMetal-Organic FrameworksWaterFluorocarbonsMetal-Organic FrameworksWateradsorptionmetal-organic frameworksphotocatalysisremediationsensors

Identifiers

PMID35843909
PMCPMC9804497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.