Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Harpreet S BhatiaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, California.
Robyn L McClellandDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Susan R HeckbertDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Michael CriquiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, California; Department of Family Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, California.
Parveen GargDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: parveeng@med.usc.edu.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Southern California · US
Funding
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Task Area A Core Study Operations.Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical endpoints ascertainment, study coordination activities, maintenance of the database and biosp75N92020D00001 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLELLAND, ROBYN LEAGH · 2020 to 2025
$17.2M
Atrial fibrillation burden, vascular disease of the brain and cardiac MRI in MESAR01HL127659 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HECKBERT, SUSAN R · 2015 to 2018
$7.4M
UCSD Integrated Cardiovascular Epidemiology FellowshipT32HL079891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Matthew A Allison · 2007 to 2026
$6.7M
Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical events investigations, study operations, and data analysis and manuscript writing. If implemented, Task A.1 will provide fundin75N92020D00005 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WATSON, KAROL E · 2020 to 2025
$5.1M
TO EXERCISE OPTION PERIOD ONE (1) FOR TASK AREA A - MESA CORE OPERATIONS, FIELD CENTER.75N92020D00004 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SIEGEL, JONATHAN H · 2020 to 2025
$4.5M
Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical events investigations, study operations, and data analysis and manuscript writing. If implemented, Task A.1 will provide fundin75N92020D00006 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PANKOW, JAMES S · 2020 to 2025
$4.4M
Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical events investigations, study operations, and data analysis and manuscript writing. If implemented, Task A.1 will provide fundin75N92020D00003 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POST, WENDY S · 2020 to 2025
$3.8M
Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical events investigations, study operations, and data analysis and manuscript writing. If implemented, Task A.1 will provide fundin75N92020D00007 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BERTONI, ALAIN GERALD · 2020 to 2025
$3.5M
Task Area A shall encompass annual follow-up of cohort members, clinical events investigations, study operations, and data analysis and manuscript writing. If implemented, Task A.1 will provide fundin75N92020D00002 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEA, STEVEN J · 2020 to 2025
Elevated coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, as assessed by the Agatston method, is associated with incident atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the associations of CAC volume and density with incident AF. Participants from the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis without baseline AF and CAC >0 were included. The associations between baseline and progression (average annual change) of CAC measures and incident AF were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. CAC volume and Agatston scores were natural log (ln)-transformed, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated per standard deviation increment. The baseline analysis included 3,332 participants; 2,643 were included in the progression analysis. In multivariable models adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, volume (HR 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 1.36), density (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.25), and Agatston score (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.35) were associated with increased risk of incident AF. In models including both volume and density, the magnitude of association between volume and incident AF was unchanged, whereas the density association was eliminated (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.11). Median time to follow-up CAC assessment was 1.9 (interquartile range 1.3, 3.0) years. Similar results were observed for the association of incident AF with annual change in volume and Agatston score. CAC volume, but not density, is associated with risk for incident AF when adjusting for both. In conclusion, our findings suggest that, although CAC may be a risk marker for AF, the association between CAC and AF appears to be independent of plaque density.
Indexed as
AtherosclerosisAtrial FibrillationCoronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticVascular CalcificationCoronary AngiographyHumansIncidencePredictive Value of TestsRisk Factors
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Density of Calcified Coronary Artery Plaque and Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation (from the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). · full record | OpenQuestion