Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35843226›Full record

SynthesisEcology letters2022

Animal pollination increases stability of crop yield across spatial scales.

Jacob Bishop, Michael P D Garratt, Shinichi Nakagawa

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacob BishopDepartment of Crop Science, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-230X
Michael P D GarrattCentre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Shinichi NakagawaEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182
University of Reading · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210100812Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000348/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P003664/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefits of animal pollination to crop yield are well known. In contrast, the effects of animal pollination on the spatial or temporal stability (the opposite of variability) of crop yield remain poorly understood. We use meta-analysis to combine variability information from 215 experimental comparisons between animal-pollinated and wind- or self-pollinated control plants in apple, oilseed rape and faba bean. Animal pollination increased yield stability (by an average of 32% per unit of yield) at between-flower, -plant, -plot and -field scales. Evidence suggests this occurs because yield benefits of animal pollination become progressively constrained closer to the maximum potential yield in a given context, causing clustering. The increase in yield stability with animal pollination is greatest when yield benefits of animal pollination are greatest, indicating that managing crop pollination to increase yield also increases yield stability. These additional pollination benefits have not yet been included in economic assessments but provide further justification for policies to protect pollinators.

Indexed as

Brassica napusPollinationAgricultureAnimalsFlowersInsectaBrassica napuscoefficient of variationinsect pollinationlnCVRMalus domesticameta-analysisVicia faba

Identifiers

PMID35843226
PMCPMC9544623
OpenAlexW4285732018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.