Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842688›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Implementing community pharmacy-based influenza point-of-care test-and-treat under collaborative practice agreement.

Kenneth C Hohmeier, Kimberly McKeirnan, Julie Akers, Michael Klepser, Stephanie A Klepser, Christe Chen, Donald G Klepser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vitamin D testing in pharmacies: Results of a federal screening campaign.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth C HohmeierUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN, USA. khohmeie@uthsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-4643
Kimberly McKeirnanWashington State University College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Spokane, USA.
Julie AkersDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, Health Outreach and External Residency Research, Washington State University College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Spokane, USA.
Michael KlepserFerris State University, College of Pharmacy, Big Rapids, USA.
Stephanie A KlepserIndependent Consultant, Kalamazoo, USA.
Christe ChenUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN, USA.
Donald G KlepserCollege of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USWashington State University Spokane · USFerris State University · USKalamazoo Public Library · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and accessible testing for influenza with point-of-care testing (POCT) can be a critical factor for deciding to begin antiviral treatment. More than 10,000 pharmacies across the USA offer Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-waived POCT for infectious diseases, such as influenza A/B. Knowledge of barriers and facilitators to large-scale POCT implementation may be useful in scaling POCT for influenza test-and-treat services (Flu POCT). The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of pharmacists who were early adopters of Flu POCT and treatment under collaborative practice agreement in community pharmacy settings.

methodsQualitative research design with in-depth, semi-structured virtual video interviews of licensed US community pharmacists. Interview questions were derived from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviewees were selected via a purposeful sampling of pharmacists who were enrolled in a nationwide clinical trial involving pharmacy-based influenza test-and-treat under a collaborative agreement. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. A deductive analytic approach was used via constructs from the CFIR.

resultsSix pharmacists were interviewed. Interviews ranged from 28 to 70 min, with an average length of 46 min. Four broad themes emerged from the data, and each had corresponding subthemes and supporting quotes: influence of the Flu POCT service characteristics on pharmacy implementation, influence of factors outside of the pharmacy setting in Flu POCT implementation, factors within the pharmacy setting influencing implementation, and process of implementing Flu POCT. A novel pharmacy-based Flu POCT implementation framework is presented.

conclusionsImplementation of community pharmacy-based Flu POCT services is feasible; but, a thorough understanding of both barriers and facilitators to their implementation is needed to increase the spread and scale of these programs. Specifically, pharmacy stakeholders should focus efforts on increasing patient and provider awareness, pharmacist acceptance, leadership support, and support of health providers external to the pharmacy to improve implementation success.

Indexed as

Community pharmacyInfluenzaPharmacyPoint-of-care testPublic healthRapid diagnostic test

Identifiers

PMID35842688
PMCPMC9287716
OpenAlexW4285588790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.