Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842621›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Achieving proportional representation in a reproductive health survey through social media: process and recommendations.

Ona L McCarthy, Melissa J Palmer, Anasztazia Gubijev, Kaye Wellings, Sue Mann, Lydia Leon, Faye Callaghan, Sophie Patterson, Rebecca S French

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Burden of Poor Reproductive Health in England: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ona L McCarthyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. ona.mccarthy@lshtm.ac.uk.
Melissa J PalmerLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anasztazia GubijevLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kaye WellingsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sue MannPublic Health England, London, UK.
Lydia LeonPublic Health England, London, UK.
Faye CallaghanPublic Health England, London, UK.
Sophie PattersonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Rebecca S FrenchLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health England · GBLancaster University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe narrative surrounding women's reproductive health has shifted from a medical model to an emphasis on reproductive well-being over different life-stages. We developed and piloted a tracker survey for monitoring women's reproductive health and well-being in England, recruiting respondents online. This paper reports on the success of the online recruitment strategies in achieving a sample proportionally representative of the England general population.

methodsRecruitment was through Facebook and Instagram advertisements and dissemination through Twitter and a blog. At the end week one, the sample was reviewed and compared to the 2011 Census England population. From week two, recruitment targeted under-represented groups. Key data were compared with prevalence estimates from the Third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

resultsBetween 1 July-17 August 2021, 13,962 people initiated the online survey, with 11,578 completing it. Numbers were low initially, but peaked at 1700 survey initiations per day after increasing the daily advertisement budget on day seven. At the end of week one, minority ethnic groups and people without a degree or equivalent were under-represented. From week two, we altered the advertisement settings to show to people whose profile indicated they were a 'high school leaver' had 'up to some high school', worked in industries that do not typically require a degree or lived in local authorities with a high proportion of ethnic minority residents. This had a modest effect, with the final sample short of proportional representation in terms of ethnicity and education but close in terms of region and age. Compared to Natsal-3, we found consistency in the proportion of respondents reporting an abortion and a live birth in the last year, however, the proportion of our sample reporting ever having experienced infertility was significantly higher than in Natsal-3, as was the proportion of 'planned' pregnancies in the last year.

conclusionsIt is possible to recruit large numbers of respondents online, relatively quickly, to complete a reproductive health survey. This will be valuable to track reproductive health and well-being at a national level over time. More work is needed to understand reasons for non-response among under-represented groups.

Indexed as

Social MediaEthnicityFemaleHumansMinority GroupsPregnancyReproductive HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesInternet surveyOnline surveyReproductive healthSurvey methodsWeb survey

Identifiers

PMID35842621
PMCPMC9288271
OpenAlexW4285677276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.