Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842616›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Web-based treatment for depression in pregnancy: a feasibility study of Mum2BMoodBooster.

Alan W Gemmill, Jessica Lee Oliva, Jennifer Ericksen, Charlene Holt, Christopher J Holt, Jeannette Milgrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. National Implementation of Perinatal Mental Health Treatment-The MumSpace Digital Stepped-Care Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alan W Gemmill *Parent-Infant Research Institute, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia. alan.gemmill@austin.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-4110
Jessica Lee Oliva *Department of Psychology, College of Health Care Science, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-045X
Jennifer EricksenParent-Infant Research Institute, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-0103
Charlene HoltParent-Infant Research Institute, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2477-6375
Christopher J HoltAustralian College of Applied Professions, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-3759
Jeannette MilgromParent-Infant Research Institute, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, VIC, 3081, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-4595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in pregnancy is prevalent, under-treated, and has serious impacts on the wellbeing of women and on child development. Internet programs can reach women who may not access traditional treatments due to distance, stigma or concern about taking medication. We adapted our online postnatal depression program, MumMoodBooster, for antenatal use. We aimed to trial feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the new Mum2BMoodBooster intervention with depressed pregnant women.

methodsTwenty-seven pregnant women with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score > 11 used the program in a feasibility trial. Twenty-one had current diagnoses of major or minor depression on the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV. Assessment of symptoms occurred at screening/baseline, post-test (8 weeks post-enrollment), and at follow-up (3 months postpartum) using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21).

resultsIn this feasibility trial, depression scores on both the PHQ-9 and the DASS-21, showed significant reductions representing large effects, with average symptom scores reduced by > 50%, and maintained in the 'minimal or no depression' range at 3 month follow-up. Anxiety scores also decreased significantly. Program usage was high with 74% of women visiting all six sessions. Program acceptability ratings were moderate to high.

conclusionsFindings paralleled the magnitude of symptom reductions seen in randomised trials of the postnatal MumMoodBooster program, suggesting that Mum2BMoodBooster is an effective treatment for depressed pregnant women. Effective internet therapies are likely to become increasingly important as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to make face-to-face access to health care problematic during 'lockdowns'.

Indexed as

COVID-19Depression, PostpartumCommunicable Disease ControlFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternetPandemicsPregnancyTreatment OutcomeAntenatal depressionFeasibility trial, cognitive-behavioural therapyInternet interventionWeb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID35842616
PMCPMC9287696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.