Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842575›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2022

Quality of recovery in patients administered remimazolam versus those administered an inhalant agent for the maintenance of general anesthesia: a randomized control trial.

Seung Woo Song, Yo Nam Jang, Min-Woo Yoon, Yeong-Gwan Jeon

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Woo SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-ro 20, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26426, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1030-5348
Yo Nam JangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1564-1997
Min-Woo YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8854-8780
Yeong-Gwan JeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Ilsan-ro 20, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, 26426, Republic of Korea. ygjeon@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-0908
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemimazolam is a novel intravenous benzodiazepine that is appropriate for the maintenance of anesthesia. Quality of recovery is an important component of health care quality, but there is no published randomized control trial focused on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam.

methodsThis parallel-group, single-blind randomized control trial at a tertiary care medical center in South Korea was conducted to determine the difference in the quality of recovery between the patients administered remimazolam and those administered an inhalant anesthetic agent. A total of 168 patients aged 19-65 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or robotic gynecologic surgery were considered for enrollment. Randomization was performed using sealed envelopes containing computer-generated random allocation sequences. Remimazolam was administered for the maintenance of anesthesia in the remimazolam group (Group R), and desflurane was administered in the desflurane group (Group D). The induction protocol and the target value of the bispectral index were identical in both groups. Patients were blinded to the drug that was administered until they finished the postoperative questionnaire. The main outcome measure was the decrement of the QoR-40 score on postoperative day 1 compared to the QoR-40 score on the day before surgery.

resultsA total of 165 patients were analyzed. The preoperative and postoperative global QoR-40 scores were 183 and 152 (IQR 173-192 and 136-169), respectively. The perioperative decrement of the global QoR-40 score was 29.96 ± 22.49. The decrement of the QoR-40 score was smaller in Group R than in Group D (26.99 versus 32.90, respectively; mean difference 5.91, 95% confidence interval -0.96-12.79). After adjustment for sex, the type of surgery and surgical time, the administration of remimazolam resulted in a 7.03-point (95% CI 0.35-13.72) less decrement of the QoR-40 score than desflurane. There were no severe adverse events in either group.

conclusionTotal intravenous anesthesia maintained with remimazolam provides a better quality of recovery than anesthesia maintained with an inhalant agent in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, postoperative nausea and vomiting were largely reduced with remimazolam.

trial registrationKCT0006288 , Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea Registration date: 23/06/2021.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralBenzodiazepinesDesfluraneFemaleHumansPostoperative Nausea and VomitingSingle-Blind MethodBenzodiazepinesDesfluraneremimazolamAnesthesia Recovery PeriodGeneral AnesthesiaPostoperative Nausea and VomitingRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID35842575
PMCPMC9288018
OpenAlexW4285588074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.