Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2023
Comparison of Efficacy of Aspirin Plus EOX vs. EOX Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Gastric Cancer: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticancer and Antiphytopathogenic Activity of Fluorinated Isatins and Their Water-Soluble Hydrazone Derivatives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Aspirin and cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical outcomes.Open biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe role of aspirin in cancer prevention has been well defined; the last decade revealed its therapeutic role with improved efficacy when aspirin was added to capecitabine in heavily pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Aspirin affects tumour growth through the PI3K pathway, which regulates apoptosis and autophagy. The objective was to compare the efficacy of aspirin plus epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (EOX) chemotherapy versus EOX alone in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer.
methodsAll patients with advanced gastric cancer reporting to the Department of Medical oncology between March 2017 and May 2019 were screened for study eligibility. They were randomly assigned to standard EOX with or without aspirin at a daily dose of 150 mg. Tumour measurements were assessed at baseline and after 3-4 cycles by an independent blinded radiologist according to RECIST criteria 1.1. Toxicity profiles were recorded as per CTCAE v 4.03. Per-protocol group was identified as 70 patients. The primary endpoint was overall response rates in the per-protocol group (defined as patients who received a minimum of 3 cycles and had an evaluable response after randomization). The secondary endpoints included toxicity analysis, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
resultsNinety-five patients who fulfilled the study inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized to group 1 EOX (50) or group 2 EOX plus aspirin (45). Seventy patients were included for the per-protocol analysis. The overall response rate in group 1 was 27% compared to group 2, which was 42%, P = 0.176. The median duration of follow was 29 (18.56-39.45) months. The median overall survival (n = 95) of group 1 versus group 2 was 11 (8.58-13.42) months and 10 (6.86-13.14) months, respectively, P = 0.90. There was no statistical significance in the overall survival per-protocol analysis (n = 70) between group one 12 (8.75-15.25) months versus group two 12 (6.21-17.79) months, P = 0.50.
conclusionsThere was no improvement in the response rates, progression-free survival, and overall survival on adding aspirin to EOX chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in an unselected population. A further role of PI3K mutation as a biomarker needs to be evaluated in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.