ArticleScientific reports2022
Automated identification of hip arthroplasty implants using artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Hybrid Automatic Model for Circle Detection in X-Ray Imagery: A Case Study on Hip Prosthesis Wear.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- Deep Learning for Automated Classification of Hip Hardware on Radiographs.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in Advancing Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting acetabular version in native hip joints through plain x-ray radiographs: a comparative analysis of convolutional neural network model and the current gold standard, with insights and implications for hip arthroplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Review
- Educational Overview of the Concept and Application of Computer Vision in Arthroplasty.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of deep learning methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) to detect and identify specific hip arthroplasty models. In this study, we propose a novel deep learning-based approach to identify hip arthroplasty implants' design using anterior-posterior images of both the stem and the cup. We harness the pre-trained ResNet50 CNN model and employ transfer learning methods to adapt the model for the implants identification task using a total of 714 radiographs of 4 different hip arthroplasty implant designs. Performance was compared with the operative notes and crosschecked with implant sheets. We also evaluate the difference in performance of models trained with the images of the stem, the cup or both. The training and validation data sets were comprised of 357 stem images and 357 cup radiographs across 313 patients and included 4 hip arthroplasty implants from 4 leading implant manufacturers. After 1000 training epochs the model classified 4 implant models with very high accuracy. Our results showed that jointly using stem images and cup images did not improve the classification accuracy of the CNN model. CNN can accurately distinguish between specific hip arthroplasty designs. This technology could offer a useful adjunct to the surgeon in preoperative identification of the prior implant. Using stem images or cup images to train the CNN can both achieve effective identification accuracy, with the accuracy of the stem images being higher. Using stem images and cup images together is not more effective than using images from only one perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.