Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842451›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Three-dimensional conditional generative adversarial network-based virtual thin-slice technique for the morphological evaluation of the spine.

Atsushi Nakamoto, Masatoshi Hori, Hiromitsu Onishi, Takashi Ota, Hideyuki Fukui, Kazuya Ogawa, Jun Masumoto, Akira Kudo, Yoshiro Kitamura, Shoji Kido and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-class cervical spine fracture classification using deep ensemble model based on CT images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Atsushi NakamotoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. a-nakamoto@radiol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Masatoshi HoriDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Hiromitsu OnishiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takashi OtaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hideyuki FukuiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kazuya OgawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Jun MasumotoMedical System Research and Development Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, 26-30, Nishiazabu 2-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-8620, Japan.
Akira KudoImaging Technology Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, 26-30, Nishiazabu 2-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-8620, Japan.
Yoshiro KitamuraImaging Technology Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, 26-30, Nishiazabu 2-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-8620, Japan.
Shoji KidoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual thin-slice (VTS) technique is a generative adversarial network-based algorithm that can generate virtual 1-mm-thick CT images from images of 3-10-mm thickness. We evaluated the performance of VTS technique for assessment of the spine. VTS was applied to 4-mm-thick CT images of 73 patients, and the visibility of intervertebral spaces was evaluated on the 4-mm-thick and VTS images. The heights of vertebrae measured on sagittal images reconstructed from the 4-mm-thick images and VTS images were compared with those measured on images reconstructed from 1-mm-thick images. Diagnostic performance for the detection of compression fractures was also compared. The intervertebral spaces were significantly more visible on the VTS images than on the 4-mm-thick images (P < 0.001). The absolute value of the measured difference in mean vertebral height between the VTS and 1-mm-thick images was smaller than that between the 4-mm-thick and 1-mm-thick images (P < 0.01-0.54). The diagnostic performance of the VTS images for detecting compression fracture was significantly lower than that of the 4-mm-thick images for one reader (P = 0.02). VTS technique enabled the identification of each vertebral body, and enabled accurate measurement of vertebral height. However, this technique is not suitable for diagnosing compression fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionSpinal FracturesAlgorithmsHumansSpineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35842451
PMCPMC9288435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.