Article in Seminars in perinatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Howard W KilbrideDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy-Kansas City and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, 3rd Floor Annex, Kansas City, MO. Electronic address: hkilbride@cmh.edu.
Betty R VohrDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Brown University, Providence, RI.
Elisabeth M McGowanDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island and Brown University, Providence, RI.
Myriam Peralta-CarcelenDivision of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Kimberlly StringerDivision of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abhik DasSocial, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences Unit, RTI International, Rockville, MD.
Stephanie Wilson ArcherEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD.
Susan R HintzDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USRTI International · USStanford University · US
Funding
Neonatal Research Network Data Coordinating Center (DCC)U10HD036790 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI DAS, ABHIK · 2008 to 2017
$62.3M
Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Data Ctr for the Cooperative Neonatal Research NetworkU01HD036790 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI DAS, ABHIK · 1998 to 2007
$21.8M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD027904 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI LAPTOOK, ABBOT R · 1991 to 2015
$8.7M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD021373 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI KENNEDY, KATHLEEN A · 1991 to 2015
$6.1M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research NetworkU10HD040689 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WYCKOFF, MYRA HELEN · 2001 to 2015
$5.6M
NICHD Neonatal Research Network -- Cincinnati Clinical CenterUG1HD027853 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI STEPHANIE L MERHAR · 2016 to 2026
$3.7M
Clinical Center for NICHD/Neonatal Research NetworkUG1HD068244 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Sara Bonamo DeMauro, Eric C Eichenwald · 2016 to 2026
$3.6M
NICHD COPPERATIVE MULTICENTER NEONATAL RESEARCH NETWORKUG1HD040689 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Myra Helen Wyckoff · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
NICHD Neonatal Research Network Clinical Center - Case Western Reserve UniversityUG1HD021364 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Maria Hibbs · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
North Carolina Clinical CenterUG1HD040492 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHARLES Michael COTTEN, Matthew Laughon · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Neonatal Research Network - Utah CenterUG1HD087226 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROBIN K OHLS · 2016 to 2026
At the inception of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN), provision of care for extremely preterm (EPT) infants was considered experimental. The NRN Follow-up Study Group, initiated in 1993, developed infrastructure with certification processes and standards, allowing the NRN to assess 2-year outcomes for EPT and to provide important metrics for randomized clinical trials. This chapter will review the NRN Follow-up Study Group's contributions to understanding factors related to improved neurodevelopmental, behavioral, and social-emotional outcomes of EPT infants. We will also discuss follow up challenges, including reassessing which outcomes are most meaningful for parents and investigators. Finally, we will explore how outcome studies have informed clinical decisions and ethical considerations, given limitations of prediction of complex later childhood outcomes from early neurodevelopmental findings.
Indexed as
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)ChildFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornUnited States
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Early neurodevelopmental follow-up in the NICHD neonatal research network: Advancing neonatal care and outcomes, opportunities for the future. · full record | OpenQuestion