Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35842096›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Decoding the temporal dynamics of spoken word and nonword processing from EEG.

Bob McMurray, McCall E Sarrett, Samantha Chiu, Alexis K Black, Alice Wang, Rebecca Canale, Richard N Aslin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bob McMurrayDept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dept. of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dept. of Linguistics and Dept. of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa. Electronic address: Bob-mcmurray@uiowa.edu.
McCall E SarrettInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Unviersity of Iowa.
Samantha ChiuDept. of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.
Alexis K BlackSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia, Haskins Laboratories.
Alice WangDept. of Psychology, University of Oregon, Haskins Laboratories.
Rebecca CanaleDept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Haskins Laboratories.
Richard N AslinHaskins Laboratories, Department of Psychology and Child Study Center, Yale University, Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut.

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
The Development of Real Time Spoken and Written Word Recognition: Cognitive Bases of Language and Educational OutcomesR01DC008089 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCMURRAY, BOB · 2007 to 2023
$7.3M
Training in the Cognitive Neuroscience of CommunicationT32DC017703 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Inge-Marie Eigsti, Emily B Myers · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
Decoding the neural time-course of spoken word recognitionR21DC017596 · NIDCD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., MCMURRAY, BOB · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008089NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017596NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC017703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of spoken word recognition is essential for real-time communication. There is consensus that this efficiency relies on an implicit process of activating multiple word candidates that compete for recognition as the acoustic signal unfolds in real-time. However, few methods capture the neural basis of this dynamic competition on a msec-by-msec basis. This is crucial for understanding the neuroscience of language, and for understanding hearing, language and cognitive disorders in people for whom current behavioral methods are not suitable. We applied machine-learning techniques to standard EEG signals to decode which word was heard on each trial and analyzed the patterns of confusion over time. Results mirrored psycholinguistic findings: Early on, the decoder was equally likely to report the target (e.g., baggage) or a similar sounding competitor (badger), but by around 500 msec, competitors were suppressed. Follow up analyses show that this is robust across EEG systems (gel and saline), with fewer channels, and with fewer trials. Results are robust within individuals and show high reliability. This suggests a powerful and simple paradigm that can assess the neural dynamics of speech decoding, with potential applications for understanding lexical development in a variety of clinical disorders.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansPsycholinguisticsRecognition, PsychologyReproducibility of ResultsEEGMachine LearningSpeech DecodingSpoken Word Recognition

Identifiers

PMID35842096
PMCPMC10875705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.