Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841887›Full record

SynthesisCell reports. Medicine2022

Resolving SARS-CoV-2 CD4

Mikhail V Pogorelyy, Elisa Rosati, Anastasia A Minervina, Robert C Mettelman, Alexander Scheffold, Andre Franke, Petra Bacher, Paul G Thomas

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cell reports. Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational detection of antigen-specific B cell receptors following immunization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. De novo identification of CD4Nature methods · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mikhail V PogorelyyDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
Elisa RosatiInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Institute of Immunology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anastasia A MinervinaDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
Robert C MettelmanDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
Alexander ScheffoldInstitute of Immunology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Petra BacherInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Institute of Immunology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: p.bacher@ikmb.uni-kiel.de.
Paul G ThomasDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38103, USA. Electronic address: paul.thomas@stjude.org.

Funding

DECODING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN T CELL RECEPTORS AND PEPTIDE-MHCR01AI136514 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Paul G. Thomas · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Investigating the cellular responses to influenza virus infection and the origins of first exposure immune imprintingF32AI157296 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI METTELMAN, ROBERT C · 2021 to 2023
$210k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI157296NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current strategy to detect immunodominant T cell responses focuses on the antigen, employing large peptide pools to screen for functional cell activation. However, these approaches are labor and sample intensive and scale poorly with increasing size of the pathogen peptidome. T cell receptors (TCRs) recognizing the same epitope frequently have highly similar sequences, and thus, the presence of large sequence similarity clusters in the TCR repertoire likely identify the most public and immunodominant responses. Here, we perform a meta-analysis of large, publicly available single-cell and bulk TCR datasets from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected individuals to identify public CD4

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopesHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityEpitopesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellCD4 T cellsCOVID-19epitope discoverypublic T cell responseT cell receptorTCR repertoire

Identifiers

PMID35841887
PMCPMC9247234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.