Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841632›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Perception of poultry veterinarians on the use of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance in egg production.

Mariana C Torres, Tatiana R Vieira, Marisa R I Cardoso, Franciele M Siqueira, Mauro R Borba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana C TorresDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil.
Tatiana R VieiraDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil.
Marisa R I CardosoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil.
Franciele M SiqueiraPostgraduate Program in Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil; Department of Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil. Electronic address: franciele.siqueira@ufrgs.br.
Mauro R BorbaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul CEP: 91540-000, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the perception of veterinarians who work with commercial laying hens in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, regarding the use of antibiotics and their possible impacts on animal, human, and environmental health. A descriptive epidemiological study was carried out through face-to-face or web conferencing interviews with the veterinarians that provide technical assistance at commercial laying hen operations. A standardized and structured questionnaire was developed based on the literature and expert opinion, which contained 1 opened and 40 closed questions. Conventional non-probabilistic sampling was used, based on an initial list of 15 veterinarians registered in the Poultry Production Association of Rio Grande do Sul, followed by the snowball technique. The acquisition of 26 contacts of veterinarians was accomplished, and 16 were interviewed. Through the answers obtained it was possible to verify that the interviewees' understanding regarding both the antibiotic resistance impact and the decision-making about the use of antibiotics seem to be linked to their practical experiences. Besides that, according to the veterinarians, farmers can acquire and administer the antimicrobials on their farms. Moreover, both farm storage and administration of lower doses of antibiotics than the recommended one could be contributing factors to resistant bacteria selection. Furthermore, controversially, the professionals believed that resistant bacteria can be transmitted to humans from eggs, but they said that there are no bacteria in eggs. Therefore, the veterinarians´ practices can be improved considering national and international guidelines on antimicrobial resistance to minimize the development of resistance. Finally, it is expected that the present results will contribute to a more complex discussion about antimicrobial resistance, helping to formulate public policies in the egg production industry.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsVeterinariansAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansOvumPerceptionPoultryAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantibioticsknowledge/awarenesslaying hensOne Health

Identifiers

PMID35841632
PMCPMC9293647
OpenAlexW4281842254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.