Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841622›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Combining ethnography and conversation analysis to explore interaction in dementia care settings.

John Chatwin, Katherine Ludwin, Isabelle Latham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Combining ethnography and conversation analysis to explore interaction in dementia care settings.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John ChatwinResearch and Innovation, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3091-9117
Katherine LudwinResearch and Innovation, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.
Isabelle LathamLearning & Development, Hallmark Care Homes, Essex, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well established that the actions and behaviour of care home workers are fundamental to the well-being of the people they care for. They not only deliver basic care but through their day-to-day presence provide an underlying continuity for residents, many of whom will have dementia or other cognitive problems. This can have many positive psychological and social benefits. A variety of ethnographic approaches have been used to explore the broader social and cultural dimensions of dementia care work. Similarly, there is a growing body of work applying micro-level approaches such as conversation analysis (CA) to describe the interactional mechanics of specific care skills. STRATEGY: We outline what ethnography and CA are, how they work as stand-alone methodologies and how they have been used in care work and dementia care settings. A working illustration is given of how the two approaches may be integrated. DISCUSSION: Dementia care workers occupy a uniquely tenuous sociopolitical and professional position within healthcare. If they are to progress to a more professional status there is a pressing need for standardized systems of training to be developed. As has been common practice in most other fully professionalized sectors of healthcare, this training needs to be backed up by an understanding of how effective care work is undertaken at the micro-level. For it to be practically relevant to care workers it also needs to have been informed by the wider social context in which it occurs.

conclusionWe argue that elements of ethnography and CA can be usefully combined to provide the fully contextualized micro-level descriptions of care work practice that will be needed if current moves towards the greater professionalization of care work are to continue. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The authors undertake a significant amount of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement and study codesign with members of the public, care workers and people living with dementia. Our engagement work with care staff and family carers undertaken as part of a current National Institute for Health Research study exploring naturalistic care worker skills (see acknowledgements) has been particularly relevant in shaping this article.

Indexed as

DementiaAnthropology, CulturalCaregiversCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHumansconversation analysisdementia careethnographyvideo-ethnography

Identifiers

PMID35841622
PMCPMC9615051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.