Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841618›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2023

Developing guidelines for pet rat housing through expert consultation.

Vikki Neville, Kristina Hunter, Livia Benato, Michael Mendl, Elizabeth S Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vikki NevilleBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-1353
Kristina HunterCity Vets, Exeter, UK.
Livia BenatoBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-4194
Michael MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth S PaulBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

BBSRC BB/T002654/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPet care guidelines play an important role in ensuring that owners are well informed about good husbandry practices, allowing them to provide the best care for their animals. However, the development of such guidelines is difficult when there is little appropriate empirical evidence on which to base guidelines, as in the case of pet rats. The consultation of multiple experts can help to surmount this challenge.

methodsWe developed a set of guidelines for pet rat housing by consulting with a group of experts, including veterinarians, veterinary nurses, animal welfare scientists and experienced pet rat owners. The consultation involved two rounds of online surveys (n = 13) and one online discussion (n = 8).

resultsThe resulting guidelines cover a broad range of features within pet rat housing, including injury prevention, details of suitable refuges and substrates, and suitable cage sizing. The guidelines may evolve as more information about pet rats comes to light but may nonetheless provide a useful starting point for any future guidelines.

conclusionsAt present, these guidelines may not only be useful for pet rat owners and those advising pet rat owners, such as veterinarians, but may also be useful in the design of housing, including for laboratory rodents.

Indexed as

Animal TechniciansVeterinariansAnimalsHousingHumansOwnershipRatsRodentiaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35841618
PMCPMC10084028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.