Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841400›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Self-management of vaginal cube pessaries may be a game changer for pelvic organ prolapse treatment: a long-term follow-up study.

Zoltan Nemeth, Szilard Kolumban, Roxana Schmidt, Peter Gubas, Kalman Kovacs, Balint Farkas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attitudes toward conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence with vaginal pessaries: A national survey among Israeli obstetricians and gynecologists.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zoltan NemethDepartment of Gynaecology, Brothers of St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Szilard KolumbanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pecs School of Medicine, 17 Edesanyak Str., Pecs, Hungary.
Roxana SchmidtDepartment of Gynaecology, Brothers of St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter GubasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, B-A-Z County Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Kalman KovacsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pecs School of Medicine, 17 Edesanyak Str., Pecs, Hungary.
Balint FarkasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pecs School of Medicine, 17 Edesanyak Str., Pecs, Hungary. dr.balint.farkas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-2057
Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God · ATHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUUniversity of Miskolc · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisLoss of anatomical support for the pelvic organs results in pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We hypothesized that daily self-management of a cube pessary might be a safe, feasible long-term treatment in women with symptomatic POP.

methodsA cohort of 214 symptomatic POP patients (stage 2+) were enrolled prospectively (January to December 2015). Each patient was size-fitted with a space-filling cube pessary and completed a questionnaire online or by phone ≥5 years after her initial fitting. Change in quality of life (QoL) was measured with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I).

resultsOf 185 women included in our analyses, 174 (94%) were continuing to use their pessary 4 weeks post-insertion. Among those, 143 (82.2%) used the pessary successfully for ≥5 years. A large majority of these patients (88.8% [127 out of 143]) described their condition as much or very much improved compared with their pretreatment status (PGI-I). Adverse secondary effects (ASEs) were infrequent [15.4% (22 out of 143)]; when they did occur, they were mild, including smelly vaginal discharge (15 out of 22) and slight vaginal bleeding caused by the fitting procedure (6 out of 22).

conclusionsDaily self-management of cube pessaries was found to be a safe and effective treatment for improving POP-related symptoms and QoL in the long term.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseSelf-ManagementFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPessariesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeLong-term follow-upSafetySelf-managementVaginal pessary

Identifiers

PMID35841400
PMCPMC9287815
OpenAlexW4285588476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.