Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841207›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Caregiver activation of relatives of patients with advanced cancer.

Evi Marit Bakker, Frederika Erica Witkamp, Khanh Linh Nancy Luu, Sophie Irene van Dongen, Natasja Johanna Helena Raijmakers, Janneke van Roij, Agnes van der Heide, Judith Anna Catharina Rietjens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caregiver activation: a concept analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. From Willingness to Readiness: Caregiver Activation for Cancer Care in Singapore.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evi Marit BakkerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-4151
Frederika Erica WitkampDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Khanh Linh Nancy LuuDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sophie Irene van DongenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Natasja Johanna Helena RaijmakersNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janneke van RoijNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Agnes van der HeideDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith Anna Catharina RietjensDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde · NLTilburg University · NL

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO), Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Vidi 91717386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRelatives of patients with advanced cancer often have many caring responsibilities. Not everyone may have sufficient knowledge, skills, and confidence-also known as caregiver activation-to provide such care. We assessed caregiver activation in relatives and its association with their personal characteristics and their own well-being.

methodsA cross-sectional study among relatives of patients with advanced cancer. Measures included caregiver activation (C-PAM), resilience, personal self-care, caregiver burden, depressive symptoms, quality of life, and social well-being. The C-PAM distinguishes four levels of activation, ranging from poor (level 1) to adequate (level 4). Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-four relatives were included; 32% had level 1 activation, 30% level 2, 27% level 3 and 11% level 4. Higher levels of caregiver activation were found among partners, those who provided more hours of informal care, were more resilient, and scored higher on personal self-care. Higher caregiver activation was associated with lower caregiver burden, less depressive symptoms, and better social well-being.

conclusionIn our study, the majority of relatives seem insufficiently prepared to provide care for their loved one. Supporting them in gaining knowledge, skills, and confidence to provide such care may improve their own well-being.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient CareQuality of Lifeadvanced cancercaregiver activationinformal caregiverspalliative carerelativesself-management

Identifiers

PMID35841207
PMCPMC9788340
OpenAlexW4285587421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.