Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841117›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2022

Costs and cost-effectiveness of HIV early infant diagnosis in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Kira Elsbernd, Karl M F Emmert-Fees, Amanda Erbe, Veronica Ottobrino, Arne Kroidl, Till Bärnighausen, Benjamin P Geisler, Stefan Kohler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Increasing the initiation of antiretroviral therapy through optimal placement of diagnostic technologies for pediatric HIV in Zimbabwe: A modeling analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kira ElsberndDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. elsbernd.kira@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1616-0212
Karl M F Emmert-FeesDepartment of Sports and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amanda ErbeHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Veronica OttobrinoHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arne KroidlDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin P GeislerInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Stefan KohlerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung TTU 04.918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuing progress in the global pediatric human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) response depends on timely identification and care of infants with HIV. As countries scale-out improvements to HIV early infant diagnosis (EID), economic evaluations are needed to inform program design and implementation. This scoping review aimed to summarize the available evidence and discuss practical implications of cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of HIV EID.

methodsWe systematically searched bibliographic databases (Embase, MEDLINE and EconLit) and grey literature for economic analyses of HIV EID in low- and middle-income countries published between January 2008 and June 2021. We extracted data on unit costs, cost savings, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios as well as outcomes related to health and the HIV EID care process and summarized results in narrative and tabular formats. We converted unit costs to 2021 USD for easier comparison of costs across studies.

resultsAfter title and abstract screening of 1278 records and full-text review of 99 records, we included 29 studies: 17 cost analyses and 12 model-based cost-effectiveness analyses. Unit costs were 21.46-51.80 USD for point-of-care EID tests and 16.21-42.73 USD for laboratory-based EID tests. All cost-effectiveness analyses stated at least one of the interventions evaluated to be cost-effective. Most studies reported costs of EID testing strategies; however, few studies assessed the same intervention or reported costs in the same way, making comparison of costs across studies challenging. Limited data availability of context-appropriate costs and outcomes of children with HIV as well as structural heterogeneity of cost-effectiveness modelling studies limits generalizability of economic analyses of HIV EID.

conclusionsThe available cost and cost-effectiveness evidence for EID of HIV, while not directly comparable across studies, covers a broad range of interventions and suggests most interventions designed to improve EID are cost-effective or cost-saving. Further studies capturing costs and benefits of EID services as they are delivered in real-world settings are needed.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHIV InfectionsChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly DiagnosisHumansIncomeInfantCost effectivenessDiagnosticsEarly infant diagnosisHealth systemsLow- and middle-income countriesPoint of care

Identifiers

PMID35841117
PMCPMC9284833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.