Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841082›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Men in Mind training for mental health practitioners to enhance their clinical competencies for working with male clients.

Zac E Seidler, Michael J Wilson, Nicholas W Toogood, John L Oliffe, David Kealy, John S Ogrodniczuk, Jesse Owen, Andrew Mackinnon, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zac E SeidlerOrygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. zac.seidler@orygen.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-1554
Michael J WilsonOrygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas W ToogoodOrygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John L OliffeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
David KealyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
John S OgrodniczukDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jesse OwenDepartment of Counselling Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, USA.
Andrew MackinnonCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Long Khanh-Dao LeSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cathrine MihalopoulosSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jane PirkisCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAMonash University · AUUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1199972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the proportion of men seeking professional mental health care has risen over the past two decades, on average, men continue to attend fewer sessions of psychotherapy and are more likely to drop out of treatment prematurely compared to women. Men account for three-quarters of suicide deaths; furthermore, over half of the males who die by suicide have engaged with mental health care in the 12 months prior to their death. These findings highlight a need to equip mental health practitioners with skills to improve male clients' engagement and mental health outcomes. This article reports the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of Men in Mind, a self-paced online training program purpose-built to advance the clinical competencies of practitioners who provide psychotherapy to male clients.

methodsA randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups will be conducted. Participating practitioners will be randomly allocated, on a 1:1 basis, to the intervention group (Men in Mind training) or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome, efficacy of the training, will be evaluated by pre- to post-training (T1 to T2) changes in scores on the Engaging Men in Therapy Scale (EMITS) in the intervention group, relative to the control group. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence of the efficacy of Men in Mind training, as an interim step towards adjusting content and delivery of the intervention to maximize the potential for sustaining and scaling.

trial registrationThe trial was registered prospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 3rd December 2021 (ACTRN12621001669886).

Indexed as

Mental HealthSuicideSuicide PreventionAustraliaClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGenderMaleMasculinityMenMental healthPractitionersPsychotherapyTrainingTrial

Identifiers

PMID35841082
PMCPMC9288021
OpenAlexW4285493386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.