Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841051›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2022

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in the emergency department: a critical incident study.

Jenny Milton, Annette Erichsen Andersson, N David Åberg, Brigid M Gillespie, Lena Oxelmark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenny MiltonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, hus 1, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden. jenny.milton@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1152-2392
Annette Erichsen AnderssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, hus 1, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden.
N David ÅbergDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita stråket SU, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Brigid M GillespieGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Gold Coast, Australia.
Lena OxelmarkInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, hus 1, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEGriffith University · AU

Funding

Västra Götalandsregionen 87760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional teams contribute to patient safety during clinical care. However, little is known about how interprofessional teams manage and cope with critical incidents in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, the study aimed to describe healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceptions of critical incidents linked to the enablers of and barriers to interprofessional teamwork in a high-risk setting, the ED.

methodsIndividual interviews with HCPs regarding events at the ED were held during the period of May 2019-January 2020. The Critical Incident Technique approach was used to guide the interviews and the qualitative analysis. Data were analyzed inductively using qualitative content analysis.

resultsInterview participants (n = 28) included 7 physicians (25%), 12 registered nurses (43%), 7 nurse assistants (25%) and 2 administrators (7%). Overall, 108 critical incidents were described. Eight categories that described functional and dysfunctional experiences within interprofessional teamwork were identified: salience of reflection; professional experience makes a difference; demanding physical and psychosocial work environment; balancing communication demands; lacking management support, structure, and planning; tensions between professional role and responsibility; different views on interprofessional teamwork; and confidence in interprofessional team members.

conclusionFindings of this study indicate that poor ED-specific communication and limited professional experience are essential factors in handling critical incidents related to interprofessional teamwork. An important aspect of critical incident management is the ergonomics of the physical work environment and how it enables interprofessional teamwork. This study emphasizes the factors enabling interprofessional teamwork to manage critical incidents in the complex working environment of the ED.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamAttitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchCommunicationCritical incidentsEmergency departmentInterprofessional teamworkPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID35841051
PMCPMC9287907
OpenAlexW4285493521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.