Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841018›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2022

The impact of coalition characteristics on outcomes in community-based initiatives targeting the social determinants of health: a systematic review.

Phoebe Nagorcka-Smith, Kristy A Bolton, Jennifer Dam, Melanie Nichols, Laura Alston, Michael Johnstone, Steven Allender

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Improvements in Capacity Among Community Coalitions Receiving Technical Assistance Through the Coalition Check-Up.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Illicit drug use in Limerick City: A stakeholder and policy analysis using multiple streams model.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Impact of the Communities that Care Approach in Reducing Violence and Crime Within an Urban, High-Burden Community.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phoebe Nagorcka-SmithDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. phoebe.nagorckasmith@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1696-4624
Kristy A BoltonDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Jennifer DamMonash University, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Melanie NicholsDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Laura AlstonDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Michael JohnstoneDeakin University, Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Steven AllenderDeakin University, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Deakin University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoalitions are a popular mechanism for delivering community-based health promotion. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize research that has quantitatively analyzed the association between coalition characteristics and outcomes in community-based initiatives targeting the social determinants of health. Coalition characteristics described elements of their structure or functioning, and outcomes referred to both proximal and distal community changes.

methodsAuthors searched six electronic databases to identify peer reviewed, published studies that analyzed the relationship between coalition characteristics and outcomes in community-based initiatives between 1980 and 2021. Studies were included if they were published in English and quantitatively analyzed the link between coalition characteristics and outcomes. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute analytical cross-sectional studies assessment tool.

resultsThe search returned 10,030 unique records. After screening, 26 studies were included from six countries. Initiatives targeted drug use, health equity, nutrition, physical activity, child and youth development, crime, domestic violence, and neighbourhood improvement. Community outcomes measured included perceived effectiveness (n=10), policy, systems or environment change (n=9), and community readiness or capacity (n=7). Analyses included regression or correlation analysis (n=16) and structural equation or pathway modelling (n=10). Studies varied in quality, with a lack of data collection tool validation presenting the most prominent limitation to study quality. Statistically significant associations were noted between community outcomes and wide range of coalition characteristics, including community context, resourcing, coalition structure, member characteristics, engagement, satisfaction, group facilitation, communication, group dynamics, relationships, community partnership, and health promotion planning and implementation.

conclusionExisting literature demonstrates that coalition characteristics, including best practice health promotion planning and evaluation, influence community outcomes. The field of coalition research would benefit from more consistent description and measurement of coalition characteristics and outcomes, and efforts to evaluate coalitions in a wider range of countries around the world. Further research using empirical community outcome indicators, and methods that consider the interrelationship of variables, is warranted.

trial registrationA protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO ( CRD42020205988 ).

Indexed as

Health PromotionSocial Determinants of HealthAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHumansResidence CharacteristicsCoalition FunctioningCoalition ImpactCoalitionsCollaborationCommunity-Based PreventionHealth Promotion

Identifiers

PMID35841018
PMCPMC9288063
OpenAlexW4285491201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.