Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35841014›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Adaptation, implementation, and mixed methods evaluation of an interprofessional modular clinical practice guideline for delirium management on an inpatient palliative care unit.

Shirley H Bush, Elise Skinner, Peter G Lawlor, Misha Dhuper, Pamela A Grassau, José L Pereira, Alistair R MacDonald, Henrique A Parsons, Monisha Kabir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improving thePalliative medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shirley H BushDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. sbush@bruyere.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-1283
Elise SkinnerDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON, K1N 5C8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-6148
Peter G LawlorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-1395
Misha DhuperFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6283-4487
Pamela A GrassauDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-1134
José L PereiraDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-7833
Alistair R MacDonaldBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Henrique A ParsonsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0436-4368
Monisha KabirBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-7661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing delirium clinical guidelines may align interprofessional clinical practice and improve the care of delirious patients and their families. The aim of this project was to adapt, implement and evaluate an interprofessional modular delirium clinical practice guideline for an inpatient palliative care unit.

methodsThe setting was a 31-bed adult inpatient palliative care unit within a university-affiliated teaching hospital. Participants for the evaluation were interprofessional team members. Using integration of guideline adaptation and an education initiative, an interprofessional guideline adaptation group developed a face-to-face 'starter kit' module and four online self-learning modules. The mixed methods evaluation comprised pre-and post-implementation review of electronic patient records, an online survey, and analysis of focus groups/ interviews using an iterative, inductive thematic analysis approach.

resultsGuideline implementation took 12 months. All palliative care unit staff attended a 'starter kit' session. Overall completion rate of the four e-Learning modules was 80.4%. After guideline implementation, nursing documentation of non-pharmacological interventions occurring before medication administration was observed. There was 60% less scheduled antipsychotic use and an increase in 'as needed' midazolam use. The online survey response rate was 32% (25/77). Most participants viewed the guideline's implementation favourably. Six key themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with ten participants: prior delirium knowledge or experiences, challenges of facilitating change, impacts on practice, collaborative effort of change, importance of standardized guidelines, and utility of guideline elements.

conclusionsGuideline implementation warrants concerted effort, time, and management support. Interprofessional team support facilitates the modular approach of guideline adaptation and implementation, leading to a change in clinical practice.

Indexed as

DeliriumHospice and Palliative Care NursingAdultFocus GroupsHumansInpatientsPalliative CareClinical practice guidelineDeliriumEducational activitiesImplementationInterprofessionalKnowledge translationLearningMixed methodsPalliative careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35841014
PMCPMC9287908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.