Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840981›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Preclinical evaluation of a commercially available biofilm disrupting wound lavage for musculoskeletal trauma.

Michael E Whitely, Sarah M Helms, Preeti J Muire, Alicia L Lofgren, Rebecca A Lopez, Joseph C Wenke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. In vitro analysis of antiseptic solution effects onJournal of bone and joint infection · 2026
    Article
  3. Orthopaedic infections: novel treatment strategies and evolving concepts.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New insights in lower limb reconstruction strategies.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael E Whitely *Combat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA. michael.e.whitely2.ctr@mail.mil.
Sarah M Helms *Combat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
Preeti J MuireCombat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
Alicia L LofgrenCombat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
Rebecca A LopezCombat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
Joseph C WenkeCombat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of open fractures remains a significant challenge in trauma care as these fractures are accompanied by extensive soft tissue damage, exposing the wound site to contaminants and increasing infection risk. Formation of biofilm, a capsule-like environment that acts as a barrier to treatment, is a primary mode by which infecting pathogens persist at the wound site. Therefore, a pressing need exists to identify irrigation methods that can disrupt biofilm and expose pathogens to treatment. This study aims to evaluate the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, in comparison with saline for care of severe musculoskeletal wounds and elucidate potential effects on antibiotic treatment success.

methodsUAMS-1 Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were formed in vitro and treated with Bactisure™ wound lavage or sterile normal saline, alone, or in combination with sub-biofilm inhibitory levels of vancomycin. Characterization methods included quantification of biofilm biomass, quantification of viable biofilm bacteria, and biofilm matrix imaging. For in vivo assessment, a delayed treatment model of contaminated open fracture was used wherein a critical-sized defect was created in a rat femur and wound site inoculated with UAMS-1. Following a 6 h delay, wounds were debrided, irrigated with lavage of interest, and antibiotic treatments administered. Bacterial enumeration was performed on bone and hardware samples after two weeks.

resultsAn immediate reduction in biofilm biomass was observed in vitro following antibiofilm lavage treatment, with a subsequent 2- to 3- log reduction in viable bacteria achieved after 24 h. Furthermore, biofilms treated with antibiofilm lavage in combination with vancomycin exhibited a minor, but statistically significant, decrease in viable bacteria compared to irrigation alone. In vivo, a minor, not statistically significant, decrease in median bioburden was observed for the antibiofilm lavage compared to saline when used in combination with antibiotics. However, the percentage of bone and hardware samples with detectable bacteria was reduced from 50 to 38%.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, may hold promise in mitigating infection in contaminated musculoskeletal wounds and warrants further investigation. Here, we proposed multiple mechanisms in vitro by which this antibiofilm lavage may help mitigate infection, and demonstrate this treatment slightly outperforms saline in controlling bioburden in vivo.

Indexed as

Fractures, OpenWound InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsRatsStaphylococcus aureusTherapeutic IrrigationVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinAntibiofilmMusculoskeletal infectionOpen fractureWound irrigation

Identifiers

PMID35840981
PMCPMC9284756
OpenAlexW4285589408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.