Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

Advancing behavioral interventions for African American/Black and Latino persons living with HIV using a new conceptual model that integrates critical race theory, harm reduction, and self-determination theory: a qualitative exploratory study.

Marya Gwadz, Sabrina R Cluesman, Robert Freeman, Linda M Collins, Caroline Dorsen, Robert L Hawkins, Charles M Cleland, Leo Wilton, Amanda S Ritchie, Karen Torbjornsen and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marya GwadzIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA. Mg2890@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-9409
Sabrina R CluesmanIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Robert FreemanIndependent Consultant, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Linda M CollinsCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline DorsenRutgers University School of Nursing, Newark, NJ, USA.
Robert L HawkinsIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Charles M ClelandCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Leo WiltonDepartment of Human Development, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Amanda S RitchieIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Karen TorbjornsenIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Noelle R LeonardCenter for Drug Use and HIV Research, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Belkis Y MartinezDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Elizabeth SilvermanIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Khadija IsraelIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra KutnickIntervention Innovations Team Lab (IIT-Lab), New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · USBinghamton University · USFordham University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCI TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007233 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS · PI GOLDSAMT, LLOYD A · 1985 to 2023
$20.2M
Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LINDA M COLLINS, SUSAN A MURPHY · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
Using MOST to optimize an HIV care continuum intervention for vulnerable populationsR01DA040480 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI COLLINS, LINDA M, GWADZ, MARYA · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Training Program for Scientists Conducting Research to Reduce HIV Health DisparitR25MH067127 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Emily A Arnold, Torsten Brian Neilands · 2003 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040480NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007233NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH067127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRates of participation in HIV care, medication uptake, and viral suppression are improving among persons living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States. Yet, disparities among African American/Black and Latino PLWH are persistent, signaling the need for new conceptual approaches. To address gaps in services and research (e.g., insufficient attention to structural/systemic factors, inadequate harm reduction services and autonomy support) and improve behavioral interventions, we integrated critical race theory, harm reduction, and self-determination theory into a new conceptual model, then used the model to develop a set of six intervention components which were tested in a larger study. The present qualitative study explores participants' perspectives on the study's acceptability, feasibility, and impact, and the conceptual model's contribution to these experiences.

methodsParticipants in the larger study were African American/Black and Latino PLWH poorly engaged in HIV care and with non-suppressed HIV viral load in New York City (N = 512). We randomly selected N = 46 for in-depth semi-structured interviews on their experiences with and perspectives on the study. Interviews were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis.

resultsOn average, participants were 49 years old (SD = 9) and had lived with HIV for 19 years (SD = 7). Most were male (78%) and African American/Black (76%). All had taken HIV medication previously. Challenging life contexts were the norm, including poverty, poor quality/unstable housing, trauma histories exacerbated by current trauma, health comorbidities, and substance use. Participants found the study highly acceptable. We organized results into four themes focused on participants' experiences of: 1) being understood as a whole person and in their structural/systemic context; 2) trustworthiness and trust; 3) opportunities for self-reflection; and 4) support of personal autonomy. The salience of nonjudgment was prominent in each theme. Themes reflected grounding in the conceptual model. Participants reported these characteristics were lacking in HIV care settings.

conclusionsThe new conceptual model emphasizes the salience of systemic/structural and social factors that drive health behavior and the resultant interventions foster trust, self-reflection, engagement, and behavior change. The model has potential to enhance intervention acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness with African American/Black and Latino PLWH.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHIV InfectionsFemaleHarm ReductionHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomyUnited StatesCritical race theoryEthnic inequalitiesHarm reductionHIV care continuumInterventionMotivational interviewingQualitativeRacialSelf-determination theoryStructural racism

Identifiers

PMID35840962
PMCPMC9286957
OpenAlexW4285587512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.