Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840815›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Percutaneous spine biopsy: reaching those hard-to-reach places.

Mayuran Saththianathan, Paul Ian Mallinson, Peter Loren Munk, Manraj Kanwal Singh Heran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spinal metastases: perioperative and oncological outcomes after separation surgery versus expanded anterior column resection: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Image-Guided Percutaneous Spinal Biopsy: CT or C-Arm Guidance?The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Bone Biopsies: Practical Considerations and Technical Tips.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mayuran SaththianathanDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1E9, Canada.
Paul Ian MallinsonDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1E9, Canada.
Peter Loren MunkDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1E9, Canada.
Manraj Kanwal Singh HeranDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1E9, Canada. Manraj.Heran@vch.ca.
University of British Columbia · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death, with the spine being the most common site for skeletal metastasis. The spine is also a site for primary malignancy, such as sarcoma and chordoma, as well as non-neoplastic pathologies. An accurate diagnosis of spinal neoplastic diseases is crucial in determining appropriate management. With the advent of personalised oncology, the need to establish a definitive histopathologic diagnosis to guide management is more important than ever. Percutaneous biopsy has proven to be safe and efficient in establishing a reliable histopathologic diagnosis. The spine, however, can be a challenging site to biopsy, due to the proximity of critical neurovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal structures. Successful spine biopsy depends on several factors: suspected diagnosis, size of the lesion, location within the spine, modality for best imaging guidance, operator experience, technical equipment considerations, and desired approach and associated limitations. The specimen must also be obtained with a biopsy route amenable to any future surgical intervention, with surgical input often sought, frequently in a multidisciplinary setting, to confirm procedure-specific goals and expectations. Knowledge of the requisite local anatomy, procedural and patient-specific indications, and contraindications and various approaches that may be used to access different segments of the spine, potential complications, and how to address these are keys to a successful percutaneous spinal biopsy, even in the most challenging of circumstances.

Indexed as

Spinal DiseasesSpineBiopsyHumansRetrospective StudiesBiopsyCervicalCTFluoroscopyLumbarPercutaneousSacralSpineThoracicTumour

Identifiers

PMID35840815
OpenAlexW4285492477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.