Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840784›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2023

Characterizing the external exposome using passive samplers-comparative assessment of chemical exposures using different wearable form factors.

Elizabeth Z Lin, Amy Nichols, Yakun Zhou, Jeremy P Koelmel, Krystal J Godri Pollitt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth Z LinDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Amy NicholsDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yakun ZhouDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jeremy P KoelmelDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Krystal J Godri PollittDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. krystal.pollitt@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7332-2228
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganic contaminants are released into the air from building materials/furnishings, personal care, and household products. Wearable passive samplers have emerged as tools to characterize personal chemical exposures. The optimal placement of these samplers on an individual to best capture airborne exposures has yet to be evaluated.

objectiveTo compare personal exposure to airborne contaminants detected using wearable passive air samplers placed at different positions on the body.

methodsParticipants (n = 32) simultaneously wore four passive Fresh Air samplers, on their head, chest, wrist, and foot for 24 hours. Exposure to 56 airborne organic contaminants was evaluated using thermal desorption gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry with a targeted data analysis approach.

resultsDistinct exposure patterns were detected by samplers positioned on different parts of the body. Chest and wrist samplers were the most similar with correlations identified for 20% of chemical exposures (Spearman's Rho > 0.8, p < 0.05). In contrast, the greatest differences were found for head and foot samplers with the weakest correlations across evaluated exposures (8% compounds, Spearman's Rho > 0.8, p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: The placement of wearable passive air samplers influences the exposures captured and should be considered in future exposure and epidemiological studies. IMPACT STATEMENT: Traditional approaches for assessing personal exposure to airborne contaminants with active samplers presents challenges due to their cost, size, and weight. Wearable passive samplers have recently emerged as a non-invasive, lower cost tool for measuring environmental exposures. While these samplers can be worn on different parts of the body, their position can influence the type of exposure that is captured. This study comprehensively evaluates the exposure to airborne chemical contaminants measured at different passive sampler positions worn on the head, chest, wrist, and foot. Findings provide guidance on sampler placement based on chemicals and emission sources of interest.

Indexed as

ExposomeWearable Electronic DevicesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHousehold ProductsHumansAnalytical methodsExposomicsFlame retardantsInhalation exposurePersonal exposurePesticidesPhthalatespolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID35840784
OpenAlexW4285593182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.