Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840777›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Mild controlled hypothermia for necrotizing enterocolitis treatment to preterm neonates: low technology technique description and safety analysis.

Walusa Assad Gonçalves-Ferri, Cristina Helena Faleiros Ferreira, Lara Malosso Sgarbi Albuquerque, Julia Belcavelo Contin Silva, Mariel Versiane Caixeta, Fabio Carmona, Cristina Calixto, Davi Casale Aragon, Gerson Crott, Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walusa Assad Gonçalves-FerriDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. walusa@fmrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-0044
Cristina Helena Faleiros FerreiraDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-1766
Lara Malosso Sgarbi AlbuquerqueDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Julia Belcavelo Contin SilvaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariel Versiane CaixetaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio CarmonaDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristina CalixtoDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Davi Casale AragonDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gerson CrottDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marisa M Mussi-PinhataDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-1570
Anelise RooschDepartment of Pediatrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lourenço SbragiaSurgery Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a quality improvement project to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and published our results about the initiative in 2021. However, aspects on the safety of the cooling and how to do therapeutic hypothermia with low technology to preterm infants are not described in this previous reporter. Thus, we aim to describe the steps and management to apply hypothermia in preterm infants using low technology and present the safety aspects regarding the initiative. We performed a quality improvement project to NEC in a reference hospital for neonatology (intensive care unit). Forty-three preterm infants with NEC (modified Bell's stage II/III) were included: 19 in the control group (2015-2018) and 24 in the hypothermic group (2018-2020). The control group received standard treatments. The hypothermia group received standard treatment and underwent passive cooling (35.5 °C, used for 48 h after NEC diagnosis). We reported cooling safety to NEC, assessing hematological and gasometrical parameters, coagulation disorders, clinical instability, and neurological disorders. We described how to perform cooling to preterm infants using incubators' servo-control and the occurrence and management of dysthermia during the cooling. We turn-off the incubator and used the esophageal probe to monitor the temperature every 15 min; if the temperature dropped, the incubator was turned on with a rewarming speed of 0.5 °C/h. The participants' average weights and gestational ages were 1186 g and 32 weeks, respectively. There were no differences among hematological indices, serum parameters (sodium, potassium, creatinine, lactate, and bicarbonate), pH, pCO2, and pO2/FiO2 between the groups during treatment and after rewarming. We did not observe dysthermia, bradycardia, hemodynamic instability, apnea, seizure, bleeding, peri-intraventricular hemorrhage, or any alterations in ventilatory parameters due to the cooling technique in preterm babies. This simple technique was performed without intercurrences through a rigorous team evaluation, with a target cooling speed of 0.5 °C/h. The target temperature was successfully reached between the second and third hours of life with the incubator control in 21 children; ice bags were used in only three cases. The temperature was maintained at the expected level during the programmed cooling period.

conclusionMild controlled hypothermia for preterm infants with NEC is safe. The cooling of preterm infants could be performed through passive methods, using the servo-control of the incubators for temperature management. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Mild controlled hypothermia to NEC treatment is feasible and associated with a decrease in NEC surgery, short bowel, and death. • Mild controlled hypothermia to preterm is feasible and can be performed through low technology and passive cooling. WHAT IS NEW: • Mild controlled hypothermia to preterm is safe and does not associate with safety adverse effects during and after the cooling. • Preterm infants can be cooled through passive methods by just using the servo control of the incubator, presenting acceptable temperature variance, without dysthermia, achieving and remaining at the target temperature with a proper cooling speed. Mild controlled temperature for preterm infants does not need an additional cooling device.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingHypothermiaHypothermia, InducedChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureTechnologyInduced mild hypothermiaNecrotizing enterocolitisNeonatal prematurityQualitySafety

Identifiers

PMID35840777
OpenAlexW4285492700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.