ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Lymphatic anomalies in congenital heart disease.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeat misdiagnosis of chylous pneumonia: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The Timing and Factor of Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Infants with Down Syndrome Born at Term and Late-Preterm.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Adult fibrinous bronchitis associated with lymphatic reflux: a probable diagnosis based on convergent evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography: a simple algorithm for image interpretation.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Lymphatic plastic bronchitis.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Article
- Noncontrast MR Lymphangiography to Identify Progression of Lymphatic Abnormalities over the Course of Fontan Completion.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Preliminary report of a thoracic duct-to-pulmonary vein lymphovenous anastomosis in swine: A novel technique and potential treatment for lymphatic failure.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2024Article
- Lymphatic failure and lymphatic interventions: Knowledge gaps and future directions for a new frontier in congenital heart disease.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2024Review
- Central conducting lymphatic anomaly: from bench to bedside.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital heart disease can lead to various lymphatic complications including traumatic leaks, lymphatic overproduction, conduction abnormalities or lymphedema. Advancements in the imaging of central lymphatics and guided interventions have improved outcomes in these children. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography allows for the assessment of abnormal lymphatic drainage. This technique is preferred for evaluating lymphatic conditions such as plastic bronchitis, chylothorax, chyloptysis, chylopericardium, protein-losing enteropathy and chylous ascites, among other lymphatic disorders. In this review, we discuss lymphatic abnormalities encountered on MRI in children with congenital heart disease. We also briefly review treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.