Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840609›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Spatial organization of hydrophobic and charged residues affects protein thermal stability and binding affinity.

Fausta Desantis, Mattia Miotto, Lorenzo Di Rienzo, Edoardo Milanetti, Giancarlo Ruocco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Beyond contacts: The important role of the support region in protein complex assembly.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fausta Desantis *Center for Life Nano and Neuro Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Mattia Miotto *Center for Life Nano and Neuro Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy. mattia.miotto@roma1.infn.it.
Lorenzo Di RienzoCenter for Life Nano and Neuro Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo MilanettiCenter for Life Nano and Neuro Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo RuoccoCenter for Life Nano and Neuro Science, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the molecular determinants of protein-protein binding affinity and whether they are similar to those regulating fold stability are two major questions of molecular biology, whose answers bring important implications both from a theoretical and applicative point of view. Here, we analyze chemical and physical features on a large dataset of protein-protein complexes with reliable experimental binding affinity data and compare them with a set of monomeric proteins for which melting temperature data was available. In particular, we probed the spatial organization of protein (1) intramolecular and intermolecular interaction energies among residues, (2) amino acidic composition, and (3) their hydropathy features. Analyzing the interaction energies, we found that strong Coulombic interactions are preferentially associated with a high protein thermal stability, while strong intermolecular van der Waals energies correlate with stronger protein-protein binding affinity. Statistical analysis of amino acids abundances, exposed to the molecular surface and/or in interaction with the molecular partner, confirmed that hydrophobic residues present on the protein surfaces are preferentially located in the binding regions, while charged residues behave oppositely. Leveraging on the important role of van der Waals interface interactions in binding affinity, we focused on the molecular surfaces in the binding regions and evaluated their shape complementarity, decomposing the molecular patches in the 2D Zernike basis. For the first time, we quantified the correlation between local shape complementarity and binding affinity via the Zernike formalism. In addition, considering the solvent interactions via the residue hydropathy, we found that the hydrophobicity of the binding regions dictates their shape complementary as much as the correlation between van der Waals energy and binding affinity. In turn, these relationships pave the way to the fast and accurate prediction and design of optimal binding regions as the 2D Zernike formalism allows a rapid and superposition-free comparison between possible binding surfaces.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsMembrane ProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein BindingProtein StabilityThermodynamicsAmino AcidsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35840609
PMCPMC9287411
OpenAlexW4285589335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.