ArticleScientific reports2022
Contralateral patent processus vaginalis repair in boys: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Perspectives on the Contralateral Patent Processus Vaginalis: What About the Other Side?Cureus · 2026Review
- A 10-year review of pediatric inguinal hernia management at a tertiary center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Nuck canal cyst: use of immunohistochemistry to reveal vestigial endometriosis hidden within mural granulation tissue.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of contralateral patent processus vaginalis in children with unilateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Comparing Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy in Newborns and Infants.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To ascertain the prevalence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) in life and the significance of the prevalence trends for treatment. We performed a retrospective review of all inguinal hernias (IHs) that underwent repair in our hospital from 2014 to 2018. We analyzed the frequency of occurrence and treatment in boys. We assessed and compared the history, initial sides of hernia, CPPV and prognoses in different age groups. We assessed all IH cases repaired in our hospital and selected male patients of a variety of ages, including boys and men. Recurrent cases were not enrolled. A total of 3243 cases were enrolled: 2489 [right-sided IH 1411 (56.69%) vs. left-sided IH 975 (39.17%), bilateral IH 103 (4.14%)] in children and 754 [right-sided IH 485 (64.32%) vs. left-sided IH 236 (31.30%), bilateral IH 33 (4.38%)] in adults. A total of 1124 CPPVs were identified in children with unilateral IH (2386), and 12 were identified in adults (267) (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in recurrence rate between different subgroups of children (p > 0.05). The incidence of IH in boys was significantly higher than that in men. The number of incident cases declines rapidly with age in boys. The processus vaginalis is normally obliterated and involuted but may instead remain patent for a long period before closure; routine exploration on the contralateral side may eliminate the possibility of spontaneous PPV closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.