Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840546›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology

COVID-19: Clinical laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of novel coronavirus infected patients using molecular, serological and biochemical markers: A review.

Ghulam Rasool, Muhammad Riaz, Mazhar Abbas, Hina Fatima, Muhammad Mustafa Qamar, Farzana Zafar, Zahed Mahmood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. COVID-19: A threat to the respiratory system.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ghulam RasoolDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, 66971University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Muhammad RiazDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, 66971University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-7735
Mazhar AbbasDepartment of Biochemistry, 66920University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, (Jhang Campus) Pakistan.
Hina FatimaDepartment of Basic and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Mustafa QamarDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, 66971University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Farzana ZafarDepartment of Biochemistry, 66724University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Zahed MahmoodDepartment of Biochemistry, 72594Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
University of Sargodha · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Central Punjab · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19, a novel coronavirus disease, has provoked a variety of health and safety concerns, and socioeconomic challenges around the globe. The laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 was quickly established utilizing nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT) after the disease causing virus has been identified, and its genetic sequence has been determined. In addition to NAAT, serological tests based on antibodies testing against SARS-CoV-2 were introduced for diagnostic and epidemiologic studies. Other biochemical investigations include monitoring of peripheral blood cells count, platelets/lymphocyte ratio, coagulation profile, cardiac, and inflammatory markers such as cytokines storm are also crucial in combating COVID-19 pandemic. Further, accurate and reliable laboratory results for SARS-CoV-2 play very important role in the initiation of early treatment and timely management of COVID-19 patients, provide support in clinical decision-making process to control infection, and detection of asymptomatic cases. The Task Force on Coronavirus-19 constituted by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has recognized informational framework for epidemiology, pathogenesis, and recommended the PCR-based analysis, serological and biochemical assays for analysis, monitoring, and management of disease. This literature review provides an overview of the currently used diagnostic techniques in clinical laboratories for the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and management of COVID-19 patients. We concluded that each assays differ in their performance characteristics and the utilization of multiple techniques is necessary for the accurate diagnosis and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2BiomarkersClinical Laboratory TechniquesHumansLaboratories, ClinicalPandemicsBiomarkersbiochemical monitoringCOVID-19 Diagnosticsmolecular testingSARS-CoV-2 antibody responseserological testing

Identifiers

PMID35840546
PMCPMC9289644
OpenAlexW4285611467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.