Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840506›Full record

ArticleObesity research & clinical practice

Low prenatal resting energy expenditure and high energy intake predict high gestational weight gain in pregnant women with overweight/obesity.

Krista S Leonard, Danielle Symons Downs

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity research & clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03945266 (Control Systems Engineering for Optimizing a Prenatal Weight Gain Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03945266 nacompletednot on this map

Control Systems Engineering for Optimizing a Prenatal Weight Gain Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorPenn State UniversityRan2014 to 2018Enrolled31ConditionsOverweight and Obesity, Physical Activity, Weight Change, Body, Eating BehaviorArmsIntervention group, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krista S LeonardExercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Currently at the College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Danielle Symons DownsExercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA& Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. Electronic address: dsd11@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Control Systems Engineering for Optimizing a Prenatal Weight Gain InterventionR01HL119245 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DOWNS, DANIELLE SYMONS · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent evidence suggests that low resting energy expenditure (REE) is associated with gestational weight gain (GWG). However, little research has examined whether REE explains GWG beyond the contributions of energy intake (EI) and physical activity (PA). This study examined the extent to which EI, PA, and REE were associated with and explained second trimester GWG in pregnant women with overweight/obesity.

methodsPregnant women with overweight/obesity (N = 26) participating in the Healthy Mom Zone study, a theoretically-based behavioral intervention that adapted the intervention dosage over time to regulate GWG completed weekly point estimates of EI (back-calculation), PA (wrist-worn activity monitor), and REE (mobile metabolism device) from 14- to 28-weeks gestation. Second trimester GWG was calculated as the weekly point estimate of weight from a Wi-Fi weight scale at gestational week 28 minus the weekly point estimate of weight at gestational week 14.

resultsPartial correlations revealed second trimester EI and PA were not significantly associated with second trimester GWG, but low second trimester REE was significantly associated with high second trimester GWG. Hierarchical regression analyses showed the model of fat-free mass, EI, PA, and REE explained 56% of the variance in second trimester GWG. Low REE was the strongest determinant followed by high EI; fat-free mass and PA were not significant predictors.

conclusionsWhile EI and PA remain important determinants of GWG, future researchers should explore the role of REE to inform individualized EI and PA goals to better regulate GWG.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainBody Mass IndexEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnant PeopleEnergy intakeGestational weight gainPhysical activityResting energy expenditure

Identifiers

PMID35840506
PMCPMC13196718
OpenAlexW4285097116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.