Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840434›Full record

ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2022

"These Are Our Kids": Qualitative Interviews With Clinical Leaders in General Emergency Departments on Motivations, Processes, and Guidelines in Pediatric Sepsis Care.

Halden F Scott, Allison Kempe, Lalit Bajaj, Daniel M Lindberg, Ashley Dafoe, Brooke Dorsey Holliman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Halden F ScottDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: halden.scott@childrenscolorado.org.
Allison KempeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO.
Lalit BajajDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Daniel M LindbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Ashley DafoeAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO.
Brooke Dorsey HollimanAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · US

Funding

Enhancing Quality in Pediatrics Sepsis with Shock Prediction and Early Electronic Decision Support (EQUIP with SPEED)K08HS025696 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCOTT, HALDEN F · 2018 to 2022
$742k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveSepsis is a leading cause of pediatric death requiring emergency resuscitation. Most children with sepsis are treated in general emergency departments (EDs); however, research has focused on pediatric EDs. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to pediatric sepsis care in general EDs, including care processes, the role of guidelines, and incentivized metrics.

methodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with key informant physician and nurse leaders overseeing pediatric sepsis in general EDs in 2021, including medical directors, nurse managers, and quality coordinators. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using deductive domains based on steps of sepsis care, pediatric readiness, and structural dynamics. Domains were analyzed across interviews in matrices, using thematic analysis within domains.

resultsTwenty-one clinical leaders representing 26 hospitals, including trauma levels I to IV, were interviewed. The themes included the following: (1) motivation to improve pediatric sepsis care based on moral imperative and location; (2) need for actionable pediatric sepsis guidelines; (3) children's hospitals' role in education, protocols, transfer, and consultation; and (4) mixed feelings about reportable metrics, particularly in EDs with low pediatric volume. Sepsis care process challenges included diagnosis, intravenous access, and antibiotic delivery but varied among hospitals.

conclusionLeaders in general EDs were motivated to provide high-quality pediatric sepsis care but disagreed on whether reportable metrics would drive improvements. They universally sought direct support from their nearest children's hospitals and actionable guidelines. Efforts to address pediatric sepsis quality in general EDs should prioritize guideline design, responsive pediatric transfer and consultation systems, and locally specific process improvement.

Indexed as

MotivationSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35840434
PMCPMC9529081
OpenAlexW4285098329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.