Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840303›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

It's safe to move! A protocol for a randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of a video designed to increase people's confidence becoming more active despite back pain.

Edel O'Hagan, Adrian C Traeger, Siobhan M Schabrun, Sean O'Neill, Benedict Martin Wand, Aidan Cashin, Christopher Michael Williams, Ian A Harris, James H McAuley

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edel O'HaganCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia edel.ohagan@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1914-5918
Adrian C TraegerInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1646-1907
Siobhan M SchabrunCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9083-3107
Sean O'NeillMaridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Benedict Martin WandFaculty of Medicine, Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Aidan CashinCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-7912
Christopher Michael WilliamsInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8896-0978
Ian A HarrisMaridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
James H McAuleyCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial media provide promising contemporary platforms for sharing public health information with a broad audience. Before implementation, testing social media campaigns that are intended to engage audiences and initiate behaviour change is necessary. This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of a public health campaign to increase people's confidence in becoming more active despite low back pain in comparison with no intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an online randomised controlled trial with two intervention groups and one control group in a 1:1:1 allocation. People over 18 years of age and fluent in English will be recruited via social media advertising. We developed a social media-based public health campaign to support recommendations for managing low back pain. The interventions are two videos. Participants in the control group will be asked questions about low back pain but will not view either video intervention. The primary outcome will be item 10 of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, which asks participants to rate how confident they would feel to gradually become more active despite pain ranging from 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident). This outcome will be measured immediately in all participant groups. We will compare group mean of the three arms of the trial using univariate analyses of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. We obtained ethical approval from our institutions Human Research Ethics Committee before data collection. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed medical journal and on institution websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000466741).

Indexed as

Low Back PainAdultAustraliaHealth PromotionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designback painpain managementWorld Wide Web technology

Identifiers

PMID35840303
PMCPMC9295673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.