Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35840168›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

The economic burden of congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil: an overview at 5 years and 10 years.

Silke Fernandes, Marcia Pinto, Letícia Barros, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Thália Velho Barreto de Araújo, Tereza Maciel Lyra, Sandra Valongueiro, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Hannah Kuper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Association between congenital Zika syndrome and hospitalizations during early childhood: a nationwide cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Silke FernandesDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Silke.Fernandes@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7694-4233
Marcia PintoFernandes Figueira National Institute of Woman, Child and Adolescent Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Letícia BarrosFernandes Figueira National Institute of Woman, Child and Adolescent Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Elisabeth Lopes MoreiraFernandes Figueira National Institute of Woman, Child and Adolescent Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thália Velho Barreto de AraújoPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, Recife, Brazil.
Tereza Maciel LyraAggeu Magalhães Institute, FIOCRUZ/PE and Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Sandra ValongueiroPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, Recife, Brazil.
Mireia Jofre-BonetOffice of Health Economics and Department of Economics, City University of London, London, UK.
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-0023
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCity, University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this paper is to estimate the economic burden of children with congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) in Brazil over 5-10 years.

methodsWe conducted a modelling study based on data collected in a case-control study in Brazil, including children with CZS (cases) and typically developing children (controls), born in 2015 and 2016. In total, 484 participants were recruited in two sites, Recife and Rio de Janeiro. Social and economic information was collected in a survey from the carers of cases and controls, and detailed healthcare utilisation was recorded for each child in the Rio de Janeiro cohort prospectively in a database. We used this information to estimate the cost per child with severe, moderate and no CZS and incremental cost per child with severe and moderate versus no CZS from a disaggregated societal perspective. These estimates were incorporated into an economic burden model to estimate the incremental burden of the CZS epidemic in Brazil over 5 years and 10 years.

findingsThe societal cost per child with severe CZS was US$50 523 to 10 years of age (born in 2015 and 2016), substantially higher than the costs for moderate CZS (US$29 283) and without CZS (US$12 331). The incremental economic burden of severe versus no CZS in Brazil over 10 years was US$69.4 million from the household and US$129.0 million from the government perspective. For moderate CZS, these figures amounted to US$204.1 million and US$86.6 million. Over 10 years, 97% of the total societal economic cost of severe CZS is borne by the government, but only 46% for moderate CZS.

interpretationThe economic burden of CZS is high at the household, provider and government levels. The compensatory government payments helped to alleviate some of the additional costs incurred by families with a child qualifying for the disability benefits, and could be scaled to include the children with moderate CZS.

Indexed as

Zika VirusZika Virus InfectionBrazilCase-Control StudiesChildFinancial StressHumansSurveys and Questionnaireschild healthepidemiologyhealth economicshealth services researchpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35840168
PMCPMC9295665
OpenAlexW4285500039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.