Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35839812›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2022

The Global Retinoblastoma Outcome Study: a prospective, cluster-based analysis of 4064 patients from 149 countries.

Global Retinoblastoma Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06367530 (Global Survey of Trilateral Retinoblastoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
26.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06367530 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Global Survey of Trilateral Retinoblastoma: Incidence and Outcomes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2024 to 2029Enrolled4,351ConditionsTrilateral Retinoblastoma, RetinoblastomaArmsIncidence and survival of trilateral retinoblastoma and the differences globally
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Definition of parameters and thresholds to detect MYCN amplification in retinoblastomas.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digital PCR Quantification of a CirculatingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Global Retinoblastoma Study Group

Funding

Development of a surrogate liquid biopsy from the aqueous humor in retinoblastoma eyes.K08CA232344 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI BERRY, JESSE L · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA232344Wellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinoblastoma is the most common intraocular cancer worldwide. There is some evidence to suggest that major differences exist in treatment outcomes for children with retinoblastoma from different regions, but these differences have not been assessed on a global scale. We aimed to report 3-year outcomes for children with retinoblastoma globally and to investigate factors associated with survival.

methodsWe did a prospective cluster-based analysis of treatment-naive patients with retinoblastoma who were diagnosed between Jan 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2017, then treated and followed up for 3 years. Patients were recruited from 260 specialised treatment centres worldwide. Data were obtained from participating centres on primary and additional treatments, duration of follow-up, metastasis, eye globe salvage, and survival outcome. We analysed time to death and time to enucleation with Cox regression models.

findingsThe cohort included 4064 children from 149 countries. The median age at diagnosis was 23·2 months (IQR 11·0-36·5). Extraocular tumour spread (cT4 of the cTNMH classification) at diagnosis was reported in five (0·8%) of 636 children from high-income countries, 55 (5·4%) of 1027 children from upper-middle-income countries, 342 (19·7%) of 1738 children from lower-middle-income countries, and 196 (42·9%) of 457 children from low-income countries. Enucleation surgery was available for all children and intravenous chemotherapy was available for 4014 (98·8%) of 4064 children. The 3-year survival rate was 99·5% (95% CI 98·8-100·0) for children from high-income countries, 91·2% (89·5-93·0) for children from upper-middle-income countries, 80·3% (78·3-82·3) for children from lower-middle-income countries, and 57·3% (52·1-63·0) for children from low-income countries. On analysis, independent factors for worse survival were residence in low-income countries compared to high-income countries (hazard ratio 16·67; 95% CI 4·76-50·00), cT4 advanced tumour compared to cT1 (8·98; 4·44-18·18), and older age at diagnosis in children up to 3 years (1·38 per year; 1·23-1·56). For children aged 3-7 years, the mortality risk decreased slightly (p=0·0104 for the change in slope).

interpretationThis study, estimated to include approximately half of all new retinoblastoma cases worldwide in 2017, shows profound inequity in survival of children depending on the national income level of their country of residence. In high-income countries, death from retinoblastoma is rare, whereas in low-income countries estimated 3-year survival is just over 50%. Although essential treatments are available in nearly all countries, early diagnosis and treatment in low-income countries are key to improving survival outcomes.

fundingQueen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust.

Indexed as

Retinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaChildEye EnucleationHumansInfantProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35839812
PMCPMC9397647
OpenAlexW4285082718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.