Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35839534›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2022

Slowing down to preserve balance in the presence of optical flow perturbations.

Andrew D Shelton, Ellora M McTaggart, Jessica L Allen, Vicki S Mercer, Jason R Franz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D SheltonApplied Biomechanics Lab, Joint Dept. of BME, UNC Chapel Hill and NC State University, USA.
Ellora M McTaggartApplied Biomechanics Lab, Joint Dept. of BME, UNC Chapel Hill and NC State University, USA.
Jessica L AllenDept. of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, USA.
Vicki S MercerDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Allied Health Sciences, UNC Chapel Hill, USA.
Jason R FranzApplied Biomechanics Lab, Joint Dept. of BME, UNC Chapel Hill and NC State University, USA. Electronic address: jrfranz@email.unc.edu.
UNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

The peripheral motor repertoire as a neuromuscular constraint on walking balance integrity in age-related falls riskR21AG067388 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRANZ, JASON R · 2020 to 2021
$439k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG067388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of sensory and mechanical perturbations applied during walking has grown in popularity due to their ability to elicit instability relevant to falls. However, the vast majority of perturbation studies on walking balance are performed on a treadmill at a fixed speed. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of mediolateral optical flow perturbations on walking speed and balance outcomes in young adults walking with fixed-speed and self-paced treadmill controllers.

methodsFifteen healthy young adults (8 female, age: 23.1 ± 4.6 yrs) completed four five-minute randomized walking trials in a speed-matched virtual reality hallway. In two of the trials, we added continuous mediolateral optical flow perturbations to the virtual hallway. Trials with and without optical flow perturbations were performed with either a fixed-speed or self-paced treadmill controller. We measured walking speed, balance outcomes (step width, margin of stability, local dynamic instability) and gait variability (step width variability and margin of stability variability).

resultsWe found significant increases in step width (+20%, p = 0.004) and local dynamic instability (+11%, p = 0.008) of participants while responding to optical flow perturbations at a fixed treadmill speed. We found no significant differences in these outcome measures when perturbations were applied on a self-paced treadmill. Instead, participants walked 5.7% slower between the self-paced treadmill controller conditions when responding to optical flow perturbations (1.48 ± 0.13 m/s vs. 1.57 ± 0.16 m/s, p = 0.005). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that during walking, when presented with a balance challenge, an individual will instinctively reduce their walking speed in order to better preserve stability. However, comparisons to prior literature suggest that this response may depend on environmental and/or perturbation context. Cumulatively, our results point to opportunities for leveraging self-paced treadmill controllers as a more ecologically-relevant option in balance research with potential clinical applications in diagnostics and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Optic FlowAdultExercise TestFemaleGaitHumansMalePostural BalanceWalkingYoung AdultGaitSpeedStabilityWalking

Identifiers

PMID35839534
PMCPMC11450404
OpenAlexW4283809114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.