ReviewMedicine2022
Impact of de novo tachyarrhythmias in patients with prior acute coronary syndrome.
Review in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has increased over the decades, the overall prognosis has improved with newer stents, tailored medication, and better intervention techniques. Atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmia at the time of ACS diagnosis are known indicators of a poor acute prognosis. However, there is a lack of data regarding the long-term arrhythmic impact of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VA) on mortality in ACS patients. This study sought to elucidate the impact of tachyarrhythmia on mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with a history of ACS. This retrospective study was conducted in a single university hospital, and it evaluated the clinical outcomes, especially regarding cardiovascular mortality and readmission. The enrolled patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS between February 2004 and March 2018. Clinical information was attained by a thorough chart review. We retrospectively analyzed 560 ACS patients. We reviewed all electrocardiograms (ECGs) before and immediately after PCI, during hospitalization, and within 3 months of the index PCI. Three months after the index PCI procedure, any Holter monitoring or ECG was also reviewed for arrhythmia diagnosis. During follow-up, 91 patients were diagnosed with AF and 36 patients were diagnosed with VA. Overall mortality was related to the presence of anemia, low body mass index, low left ventricular ejection fraction after PCI, late-diagnosed AF, and any VA during follow-up. Readmission was higher in patients with chronic kidney disease and newly diagnosed AF during the follow-up. Diagnosis of late tachyarrhythmia during follow-up was associated with increased mortality in post-ACS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.