ArticleMedicine2022
Relationship between gallstones and interstitial cells of Cajal in the gallbladder.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emodin repairs interstitial cells of Cajal damaged by cholelithiasis in the gallbladder.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA high percentage of patients with gallstones exhibit abnormalities in gallbladder emptying, and gallstones are often associated with gallbladder contraction. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in the gallbladder are involved in the generation and spreading of spontaneous contractions of the gallbladder. This study examined the relationship among the number of gallbladder ICC, gallbladder contractility, and gallstones. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-six patients, who underwent cholecystectomy within 3 months of enduring a gallbladder ejection fraction scan, were enrolled in this study. ICC were identified using a microscope after immunohistochemical staining for CD117/c-kit. Five high-power field (magnification 400×) units were randomly assigned, and the number of ICC in the mucosal and muscular layers was counted. These counts were compared according to the sex, age, reason for cholecystectomy, presence of gallstone, presence of gallbladder polyp, gallbladder ejection fraction, and gallbladder size for each patient.
resultsThe number of ICC in the mucosal layer was increased in the male participants (154.4 ± 73.9) compared with the female participants (107.3 ± 75.2); however, the ICC in the muscular layer was not different between the 2 groups. Additionally, the ICC in the mucosal and muscular layers did not differ according to age, cause of cholecystectomy, number of stones, stone character, stone diameter, or the presence of polyps. A larger gallbladder size was correlated with a decreased number of ICC in the muscular layer of the gallbladder. Additionally, when the number of gallbladder stones was increased, the number of ICC in the muscular layer of the gallbladder was decreased; however, there was no significant correlation between the number of ICC in the mucosal layer of the gallbladder and any of the following factors: age, GBEF, gallbladder size, stone number, or diameter. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of ICC in the muscular layer of the gallbladder, regardless of age, GBEF, and stone diameter.
conclusionAlthough we were unable to achieve significant results regarding the relationship between GBEF and ICC, this is the first human study to reveal the relationship among ICC, gallbladder size, and the number of gallstones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.