ArticleMedicine2022
Effects of atrial fibrillation on motor outcome in patients with cerebral infarction.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) has been a leading cause of cerebral infarction, but the association with motor outcome after cerebral infarction remains unreported. In this study, we attempted to identify whether AF affects motor outcomes after cerebral infarction.
methodsSeventy-six patients with a first-incidence cerebral infarction and who completed 6 months of rehabilitation were recruited to this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of AF (AF and non-AF groups). The upper extremity motricity index, lower extremity motricity index (LMI), modified Brunnstrom classification, and functional ambulation category (FAC) were evaluated, and those results were obtained within the first day and after 6 months of onset. Clinical factors that could affect motor outcome after cerebral infarction were also obtained.
resultsCompared with the non-AF group, the AF group had an upper extremity motricity index (47.15 ± 20.30 vs 58.66 ± 19.19; P = .032), LMI (53.42 ± 12.27 vs 65.58 ± 13.86; P = .001), and FAC scores (2.39 ± 0.93 vs 3.35 ± 0.93; P < .001) at 6 months after onset. Moreover, the AF group showed a lower FAC score gain than the non-AF group at 6 months after onset (2.33 ± 0.95 vs 3.28 ± 0.94; P < .001). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that presence of AF had negative correlation with LMI gain (β = -0.197; P = .010) and FAC gain (β = -0.254; P = .011).
conclusionWe observed that AF had a negative effect on the motor outcome of the affected leg and the recovery of gait function in patients with cerebral infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.