ArticleMedicine2022
Flexion-extension-supination test compared to arthroscopic findings of biceps long head pathology: A physical examination that reflect anatomical evolution of human shoulder girdle.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of physical examination for diagnosing lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) remains unsatisfactory. The purpose of this study was to describe a new diagnostic test, the Flexion-Extension-Supination (FES) test for diagnosing lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. A prospective study of 162 patients was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of FES test. All the participants were evaluated on the basis of their clinical presentation, physical examination (FES test), radiologic findings and arthroscopic examination. Shoulder arthroscopy findings were used as the gold standard. To reduce the omission of the hidden lesion, LHBT was checked at the intra- and the extraarticular side via arthroscopic examination. Surgical findings related to biceps pathology were as follows: rotator cuff tears, 89.5% (145/162); subacromial impingement, 8.6% (14/162); and biceps tendinitis, 1.9% (3/162). The prevalence of biceps pathology was 77.2% (125/162) of all arthroscopic procedures. No significant differences for LHBT lesions were observed between the FES test and the arthroscopic findings (P = .850). The interrater reliability of the FES test was 0.747. After excluding inconclusive results between examiners, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the FES test were 87.9%, 66.7%, 82.9%, and 63.2%, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.67 and 0.18, respectively. The maneuvers of the FES test irritate intra- and extraarticular lesion of LHBT. The FES test is a reproducible and reliable test that can be used during physical examinations to evaluate patients with LHBT lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.