Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35838927›Full record

ArticleInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2022

Changes in bovine milk bacterial microbiome from healthy and subclinical mastitis affected animals of the Girolando, Gyr, Guzera, and Holstein breeds.

Raphael S Steinberg, Lilian C Silva E Silva, Marcelo R de Souza, Ronaldo B Reis, Patrícia C L da Silva, Gustavo A Lacorte, Jacques R Nicoli, Elisabeth Neumann, Álvaro C Nunes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raphael S SteinbergInstituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Campus Bambuí, Rodovia Bambuí/Medeiros - km 05, Caixa Postal 05, Bambuí, MG, 38900-000, Brazil. raphael.silva@ifmg.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-3479
Lilian C Silva E SilvaDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marcelo R de SouzaDepartamento de Tecnologia e Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, MG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ronaldo B ReisDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, MG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Patrícia C L da SilvaDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Gustavo A LacorteInstituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Campus Bambuí, Rodovia Bambuí/Medeiros - km 05, Caixa Postal 05, Bambuí, MG, 38900-000, Brazil.
Jacques R NicoliDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Elisabeth NeumannDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Álvaro C NunesDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Funding

FAPEMIG FAPEMIG APQ-02928-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raw milk samples were collected from 200 dairy cows belonging to Girolando 1/2, Gyr, Guzera, and Holstein breeds, and the bacterial diversity was explored using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. SCC analysis showed that 69 animals were classified as affected with subclinical mastitis. The milk bacterial microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, with an increase of Firmicutes in animals with subclinical mastitis and Proteobacteria in healthy animals. At the family and genus level, the milk bacterial microbiome was dominated by Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Lactococcus, Aerococcus, members of the family Rhizobiaceae, Anaerobacillus, Streptococcus, members of the family Intrasporangiaceae, members of the family Planococcaceae, Corynebacterium, Nocardioides, and Chryseobacterium. Significant differences in alpha and beta diversity analysis suggest an effect of udder health status and breed on the composition of raw bovine milk microbiota. LEfSe analysis showed 45 and 51 discriminative taxonomic biomarkers associated with udder health status and with one of the four breeds respectively, suggesting an effect of subclinical mastitis and breed on the microbiota of milk in cattle.

Indexed as

Mastitis, BovineMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaCattleFemaleHealth StatusHumansMilkRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial microbiomeMilk microbiotaStaphylococcusSubclinical mastitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.