Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35838819›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2023

[Standardized concentrations for continuous infusion-results of a nationwide survey in German intensive care units].

Lutz Kreysing, Christian Waydhas, Karl Peter Ittner, Sebastian Schubert, Irene Krämer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lutz KreysingApotheke der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Christian WaydhasKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.
Karl Peter IttnerLehr- und Forschungseinheit Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Sebastian SchubertApotheke der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Irene KrämerApotheke der Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. irene.kraemer@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous infusion of numerous parenteral medications is common practice in intensive care units (ICU). In contrast to some countries, there is a lack of clearly defined standardized concentrations in Germany, especially for high-risk medications designated for infusion therapy.

objectivesThe goal was to collect representative data of standardized concentrations commonly used for continuous infusion in German ICUs. Results should be used to draft nationwide recommendations for standardized continuous infusions. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo determine the nationwide acceptance and preference for medications designated for continuous infusion, a questionnaire was developed and sent to the directors of 1816 ICUs in Germany. The questionnaire comprised suggestions of 59 medicinal products with 73 concentrations. In addition, participants could make their own proposals on medications and concentrations preferably used. Evaluation was performed with SurveyMonkey® and Microsoft® Excel®.

resultsA total of 312 (17%) ICUs answered the survey. Data analyses indicate a very high acceptance rate for rate-controlled continuous infusion with standardized concentrations. More than 90% (50%) of participating physicians routinely use the top 10 (top 25) medicines listed for continuous infusion. For most medicines, one concentration could be identified.

conclusionsOur survey results generate a suitable basis for a nationwide list with standardized concentrations of medicines intended for continuous infusion (usually 50 mL). Publication of such a list by the corresponding expert committees is likely to be met with broad acceptance and implementation into clinical practice can be expected.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesContinuous infusionIntensive care therapyMedication safetyNationwide surveyStandardized concentration

Identifiers

PMID35838819
PMCPMC9284501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.