ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2023
[Standardized concentrations for continuous infusion-results of a nationwide survey in German intensive care units].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Recommendations on standard concentrations for continuous infusion of medicinal products in intensive care units].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous infusion of numerous parenteral medications is common practice in intensive care units (ICU). In contrast to some countries, there is a lack of clearly defined standardized concentrations in Germany, especially for high-risk medications designated for infusion therapy.
objectivesThe goal was to collect representative data of standardized concentrations commonly used for continuous infusion in German ICUs. Results should be used to draft nationwide recommendations for standardized continuous infusions. MATERIALS AND
methodsTo determine the nationwide acceptance and preference for medications designated for continuous infusion, a questionnaire was developed and sent to the directors of 1816 ICUs in Germany. The questionnaire comprised suggestions of 59 medicinal products with 73 concentrations. In addition, participants could make their own proposals on medications and concentrations preferably used. Evaluation was performed with SurveyMonkey® and Microsoft® Excel®.
resultsA total of 312 (17%) ICUs answered the survey. Data analyses indicate a very high acceptance rate for rate-controlled continuous infusion with standardized concentrations. More than 90% (50%) of participating physicians routinely use the top 10 (top 25) medicines listed for continuous infusion. For most medicines, one concentration could be identified.
conclusionsOur survey results generate a suitable basis for a nationwide list with standardized concentrations of medicines intended for continuous infusion (usually 50 mL). Publication of such a list by the corresponding expert committees is likely to be met with broad acceptance and implementation into clinical practice can be expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.