Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35838815›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2024

Does coding internal working models of attachment have to be so hard?

Amanda Venta, Veronica McLaren, Carla Sharp, Anna Abate, Madeleine Allman, Breana Cervantes, Sophie Kerr, Jessica Hernandez Ortiz, Eric Sumlin, Jesse Walker and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda VentaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA. aventa@uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1641-123X
Veronica McLarenDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Carla SharpDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Anna AbateDepartment of Psychology & Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.
Madeleine AllmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Breana CervantesDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Sophie KerrDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Jessica Hernandez OrtizDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Eric SumlinDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Jesse WalkerDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
Kiana WallDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Houston · USSam Houston State University · US

Funding

University of Houston NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) has demonstrated promise in youth, yet widespread use is thwarted by the need for interview transcription, face-to-face training, and reliability certification. The present study sought to examine the empirical basis for these barriers. Thirty-five archival CAIs were re-coded by: (1) expert coders (i.e., trained and reliable) without access to transcripts, (2) trained coders who had not completed reliability training, and (3) novice coders who had no formal training. Agreement with consensus classifications was computed with the expectation of moderate agreement. Results supported coding by experts without transcription of the interview. Near-moderate agreement preliminarily supported the use of trained coders who have not attempted reliability certification with appropriate caveats. While moderate agreement was not achieved for novice raters, findings suggest that self-paced training options for the CAI may hold future promise. These contributions erode a number of significant barriers to the current use of the CAI.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsAdolescentChildForecastingHumansChild attachment interviewInternal working modelKappaReliabilityTraining

Identifiers

PMID35838815
PMCPMC9283821
OpenAlexW4285589679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.