Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35838795›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2022

Epidemiologic profile of hard ticks and molecular characterization of Rhipicephalus microplus infesting cattle in central part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Samia Sultan, Jehan Zeb, Sultan Ayaz, Sadeeq Ur Rehman, Sanaullah Khan, Mubashir Hussain, Haytham Senbill, Sabir Husain, Olivier Andre Sparagano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Distribution ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Samia SultanDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Jehan ZebDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Sultan AyazCollege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Sadeeq Ur RehmanCollege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Sanaullah KhanDepartment of Zoology, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Mubashir HussainDepartment of Microbiology, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, Pakistan.
Haytham SenbillDepartment of Applied Entomology & Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21545, Egypt.
Sabir HusainDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Olivier Andre SparaganoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. olivier.sparagano@cityu.edu.hk.
Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKCity University of Hong Kong · HKAlexandria University · EGKohat University of Science and Technology · PKUniversity of Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick infestation is a major public and animal health concern causing significant financial losses, especially in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. This study aimed at investigating the epidemiologic profile of ticks infesting cattle and molecular identification of R. microplus in the centrally ignored part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. A total of 600 cattle from 20 farms were examined for the tick infestation, among them 358 (59.7%) cattle were infested with ticks. A total of 2118 nymph, larvae and adult tick stages were collected and morphologically identified followed by molecular confirmation of Rhipicephalus microplus. Host-based demographic and ecological parameter analysis revealed significantly higher tick infestation in adult, female, exotic, freely grazing, and with irregular/no acaricides treated cattle. The univariate logistic analysis showed that host age, gender, breed, acaricides use, and feeding method were significantly (P < 0.05) associated, whereas multivariate analysis revealed only host breed and feeding method were potential risk factors (P < 0.05) for tick infestation. Microscopy-based examination identified four different species of ticks including R. microplus (44.5%), Hyalomma anatolicum (38.5%), and Hyalomma marginatum (10.5%) and Hyalomma excavatum (6.5%). Tick infestation pattern showed that 55.9% of cattle was found co-infested with R. microplus and H. anatolicum followed by R. microplus and H. anatolicum and H. marginatum (29.3%) then R. microplus, H. anatolicum, H. marginatum, and H. excavatum (11.2%). Sequencing of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2-) and 16S rRNA gene fragments also confirmed the molecular identification of Rhipicephalus microplus. Phylogenetic analysis of ITS-2 revealed all sequences clustered in single clade of the R. microplus while the 16S rRNA nucleotide sequences showed that R. microplus in this study was clustered together in clade A along with other isolates from Pakistan, China, and India. The high tick infestation suggests the need for designing strategic and integrated control measures for ticks in order to ensure good health of domestic animals in this region of Pakistan.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesIxodidaeRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCattleFemalePakistanPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAcaricidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNACattleMicroscopyR. microplusTick infestation

Identifiers

PMID35838795
OpenAlexW4285591900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.